KTM 250 SX-F 2010 vs. Suzuki RM-125 2009

KTM 250 SX-F 2010

KTM 250 SX-F 2010

Suzuki RM-125 2009

Suzuki RM-125 2009

Loading...

Technical Specifications KTM 250 SX-F 2010 compared to Suzuki RM-125 2009

KTM 250 SX-F 2010
Suzuki RM-125 2009

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore76 mmBore54 mm
StrokeStroke54.8 mmStroke54.5 mm
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes2-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement248.6 ccmDisplacement124 ccm

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width80 mmFront tyre width80 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height100 %Front tyre height100 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter21 inchFront tyre diameter21 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width100 mmRear tyre width100 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height100 %Rear tyre height90 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter19 inchRear tyre diameter19 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,475 mmWheelbase1,450 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height985 mmSeat Height950 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity8 lFuel Tank Capacity8 l

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

KTM 250 SX-F 2010

KTM 250 SX-F 2010

The basis of the factory bikes is the same for all of them and at a very high level. It is the respective needs of the riders that make the difference. At this high level of riding, it's the little things that give the rider the necessary confidence to go to the limit.

Dominating engine performance

positive driving experience

a lot of power

detail work in every respect.

Unideal tuning

idiosyncratic driving style

suboptimal braking system.

Suzuki RM-125 2009

Suzuki RM-125 2009

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price KTM 250 SX-F vs Suzuki RM-125

Price KTM 250 SX-F

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Suzuki RM-125

Unfortunately, the data available to us is not sufficient to provide meaningful price information for this model.

Alternative Comparisons