Husqvarna SM 610 2005 vs. KTM 690 SMC R 2013

Husqvarna SM 610 2005

KTM 690 SMC R 2013

Technical Specifications Husqvarna SM 610 2005 compared to KTM 690 SMC R 2013

Husqvarna SM 610 2005

KTM 690 SMC R 2013

Husqvarna SM 610 2005

KTM 690 SMC R 2013

Engine and Drive Train

Engine power	Engine power	60 HP	Engine power	67 HP
Transmission	Transmission	Chain	Transmission	Chain
Cylinders	Cylinders	1	Cylinders	1
Strokes	Strokes	4-Stroke	Strokes	4-Stroke
Cooling	Cooling	liquid	Cooling	liquid
Displacement	Displacement	576 ccm	Displacement	690 ccm

Dimensions and Weights

Wheelbase	Wheelbase	1,500 mm	Wheelbase	1,480 mm
Seat Height	Seat Height	920 mm	Seat Height	890 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity	Fuel Tank Capacity	12.5 l	Fuel Tank Capacity	12 l
License compliancy	License compliancy	A	License compliancy	A

Pros and Cons in comparison

Husqvarna SM 610 2005

The Husky is by no means an inexpensive entry-level bike. However, single-cylinder enthusiasts looking for power, a great chassis and civil service intervals have come to the right place with the Husky. A good iron!

Optimal chassis

independent geometry

linear steering feel

high-quality fork

qualitative workmanship.

Hakelige ignition lock seems to have been reworked cheaply

high price

not suitable for long-distance travel

spare parts supply problematic.

KTM 690 SMC R 2013

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Husqvarna SM 610 vs KTM 690 SMC R

Price Husqvarna SM 610

Unfortunately, the data available to us is not sufficient to provide meaningful price information for this model.

Price KTM 690 SMC R

Model year

Average market price

Current average market prices