Kawasaki Z1000 2010 vs. Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011

Kawasaki Z1000 2010

Kawasaki Z1000 2010

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011

Loading...

Technical Specifications Kawasaki Z1000 2010 compared to Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011

Kawasaki Z1000 2010
Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore77 mmBore79 mm
StrokeStroke56 mmStroke71.4 mm
Engine powerEngine power138 HPEngine power132 HP
Compression RatioCompression Ratio11.8 Compression Ratio12
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders4Cylinders3
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement1,043 ccmDisplacement1,050 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
AdjustmentAdjustmentCompression, Preload, ReboundAdjustmentCompression, Rebound

Suspension Rear

AdjustmentAdjustmentCompression, Preload, ReboundAdjustmentCompression, Rebound

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameAluminium
Frame typeFrame typeDouble cradleFrame typeTwin Tube

Brakes Front

PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons
Shock mountShock mountSemi-SchwimmsattelShock mountFixed caliper
TechnologyTechnologyradial, PetalTechnologyradial

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonDouble piston
Shock mountShock mountFixed caliperShock mountFloating caliper

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width190 mmRear tyre width190 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height50 %Rear tyre height55 %
LengthLength2,095 mmLength2,086 mm
WidthWidth805 mmWidth728 mm
HeightHeight1,085 mmHeight1,120 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,440 mmWheelbase1,437 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height815 mmSeat Height828 mm
Kerb WeightKerb Weight221 kgKerb Weight219 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity15 lFuel Tank Capacity17.5 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Kawasaki Z1000 2010

Kawasaki Z1000 2010

Some made a noble impression at first glance, but the Japanese managed to screw up the whole bike by fitting a single rancid part (exhaust, indicators, swingarm, fork,...). Kawasaki brings the Z 1000 in 2010 all new and all serious.

Satisfaction in the saddle

plenty of power

pure pull

good chassis

comfort

sophisticated design

tightly tuned suspension elements

more direct handling.

Slightly suboptimal brake inputs - but still quite acceptable.

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011

Even a Super Duke is in a tight spot when the bends are not too sharp and the KTM can make full use of its radical handling and its unrivalled ability to correct the radius on naked bikes. The Speed Triple is more harmonious, patient and predictable. The Duke has to be beaten, the Triple can also be stroked.

Controlled chassis

hard sound

stable.

Rough gearing sometimes disturbs the idyll between man and machine.

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Kawasaki Z1000 vs Triumph Speed Triple 1050

Price Kawasaki Z1000

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Triumph Speed Triple 1050

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons