Beta Evo 300 4Takt 2017 vs. Montesa Cota 4RT 2009

Beta Evo 300 4Takt 2017

Beta Evo 300 4Takt 2017

Montesa Cota 4RT 2009

Montesa Cota 4RT 2009

Loading...

Technical Specifications Beta Evo 300 4Takt 2017 compared to Montesa Cota 4RT 2009

Beta Evo 300 4Takt 2017
Montesa Cota 4RT 2009

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore84 mmBore76.5 mm
StrokeStroke53.6 mmStroke54.2 mm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio11 Compression Ratio10.5
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement297.3 ccmDisplacement249.1 ccm

Brakes Front

PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonDouble pistonPistonDouble piston

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter21 inchFront tyre diameter21 inch
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter18 inchRear tyre diameter18 inch
LengthLength1,990 mmLength2,016 mm
WidthWidth850 mmWidth830 mm
HeightHeight1,115 mmHeight1,130 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,305 mmWheelbase1,321 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height660 mmSeat Height650 mm
Dry WeightDry Weight71.5 kgDry Weight73.8 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity2.6 lFuel Tank Capacity2 l

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Beta Evo 300 4Takt vs Montesa Cota 4RT

Price Beta Evo 300 4Takt

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Montesa Cota 4RT

Unfortunately, the data available to us is not sufficient to provide meaningful price information for this model.

Alternative Comparisons