Ducati Monster 696 2013 vs. BMW F 800 ST 2009

Ducati Monster 696 2013

Ducati Monster 696 2013

BMW F 800 ST 2009

BMW F 800 ST 2009

Loading...

Technical Specifications Ducati Monster 696 2013 compared to BMW F 800 ST 2009

Ducati Monster 696 2013
BMW F 800 ST 2009

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore88 mmBore82 mm
StrokeStroke57.2 mmStroke75.6 mm
Engine powerEngine power80 HPEngine power85 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power9,000 rpmRpm at Max. Power8,000 rpm
TorqueTorque69 NmTorque86 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque7,750 rpmRpm at Torque5,800 rpm
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionBelt
CylindersCylinders2Cylinders2
DisplacementDisplacement696 ccmDisplacement798 ccm

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,058 mmLength2,082 mm
HeightHeight1,060 mmHeight1,155 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,450 mmWheelbase1,466 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height770 mmSeat Height820 mm
Kerb WeightKerb Weight185 kgKerb Weight204 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity15 lFuel Tank Capacity16 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Ducati Monster 696 2013

Ducati Monster 696 2013

The Ducati looks wonderful, has high-quality components, has a good-sounding engine, but unfortunately also has a salty price.

Top engine

high-quality components

throaty Ducati sound

High price

poorly readable fittings

BMW F 800 ST 2009

BMW F 800 ST 2009

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Ducati Monster 696 vs BMW F 800 ST

Price Ducati Monster 696

Model year
Current average market prices

Price BMW F 800 ST

Model year
Current average market prices