Husqvarna SM 510R 2010 vs. Husqvarna TE 510 2010

Husqvarna SM 510R 2010

Husqvarna SM 510R 2010

Husqvarna TE 510 2010

Husqvarna TE 510 2010

Loading...

Technical Specifications Husqvarna SM 510R 2010 compared to Husqvarna TE 510 2010

Husqvarna SM 510R 2010
Husqvarna TE 510 2010

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore97 mmBore97 mm
StrokeStroke67.8 mmStroke67.8 mm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12.9 Compression Ratio12.9
StarterStarterElectricStarterKick
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement501 ccmDisplacement501 ccm

Suspension Front

BrandBrandMarzocchiBrandKayaba

Suspension Rear

BrandBrandMarzocchiBrandKayaba

Brakes Front

TechnologyTechnologyWaveTechnologyWave

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width90 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height90 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter21 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width150 mmRear tyre width140 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height60 %Rear tyre height80 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter18 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,445 mmWheelbase1,483 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height920 mmSeat Height963 mm
Dry WeightDry Weight120.5 kgDry Weight113 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity7.2 lFuel Tank Capacity7.2 l

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Husqvarna SM 510R vs Husqvarna TE 510

Price Husqvarna SM 510R

Unfortunately, the data available to us is not sufficient to provide meaningful price information for this model.

Price Husqvarna TE 510

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons