Honda CBR500R 2013 vs. Honda CBR650R E-Clutch 2025

Honda CBR500R 2013

Honda CBR500R 2013

Honda CBR650R E-Clutch 2025

Honda CBR650R E-Clutch 2025

Loading...

Technical Specifications Honda CBR500R 2013 compared to Honda CBR650R E-Clutch 2025

Honda CBR500R 2013
Honda CBR650R E-Clutch 2025

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore67 mmBore67 mm
StrokeStroke66.8 mmStroke46 mm
Engine powerEngine power48 HPEngine power95 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power5,500 rpmRpm at Max. Power12,000 rpm
TorqueTorque43 NmTorque63 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque7,000 rpmRpm at Torque9,499.99 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio10.7 Compression Ratio11.6
StarterStarterElectricStarterElectric
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
IgnitionIgnitionDigital, TransistorIgnitionDigital, Transistor
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders2Cylinders4
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesDOHC
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement471 ccmDisplacement649 ccm

Chassis

FrameFrameSteelFrameSteel

Brakes Front

TypeTypeSingle diskTypeDouble disk
PistonPistonDouble pistonPistonFour pistons

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonSingle piston

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width160 mmRear tyre width180 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height60 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,075 mmLength2,120 mm
WidthWidth740 mmWidth750 mm
HeightHeight1,145 mmHeight1,150 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,410 mmWheelbase1,450 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height790 mmSeat Height810 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)194 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)211 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity15.7 lFuel Tank Capacity15.4 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyA2License compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Honda CBR500R 2013

Honda CBR500R 2013

Supersport and everyday utility are two extremes that can only be combined in a compromise that only partially satisfies both sides. Honda has decided to pay more attention to everyday use and to make the CBR500R as accessible and rideable as possible. Visually, it looks sharper than it is, but fun is still not neglected because Honda always pays attention to quality and a harmonious set-up. A good choice for A2 riders and all those for whom 48 hp is enough.

Reliable

cleanly finished

relaxed seating position

low seat

attractive design

not a real super sports car

A2-level performance

Honda CBR650R E-Clutch 2025

Honda CBR650R E-Clutch 2025

The Honda CBR650R is a great mid-range supersports bike for the country road, which manages the balancing act between sportiness and accessibility very well. But other bikes in this class also manage this. What makes the CBR special is the old-school in-line four-cylinder engine at its heart. You won't win any acceleration races with it, but the in-line four inspires with its silky power delivery and screaming revviness in the upper rev range. And with the new E-Clutch technology, you can get the most out of the engine with crisp gear changes and massively increase comfort in city traffic thanks to the electronic operation of the clutch.

Screeching, "old-school" in-line four-cylinder that tempts you to wind out a gear

stable, but not overly hard fork

well-tuned brakes

sporty, but not too extreme ergonomics

great e-clutch system

Beautiful TFT display with intuitive operating concept

Shock could be more stable when leaning

Knee angle can be quite sharp with lengthy legs

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Honda CBR500R vs Honda CBR650R E-Clutch

Price Honda CBR500R

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Honda CBR650R E-Clutch

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons