BMW G 310 R 2016 vs. KTM 390 Duke 2016

BMW G 310 R 2016

BMW G 310 R 2016

KTM 390 Duke 2016

KTM 390 Duke 2016

Loading...

Overview - BMW G 310 R 2016 vs KTM 390 Duke 2016

The BMW G 310 R and the KTM 390 Duke are both naked bikes from the year 2016. While they have some similarities in terms of their technical specifications, they also have distinct differences that set them apart.

Starting with the engine and drive train, the BMW G 310 R is equipped with a 313cc single-cylinder engine that produces 34 horsepower and 28 Nm of torque. On the other hand, the KTM 390 Duke features a slightly larger 373.2cc single-cylinder engine that delivers 44 horsepower and 35 Nm of torque. This gives the KTM 390 Duke an advantage in terms of power, providing a more thrilling riding experience.

In terms of suspension, both bikes feature upside-down telescopic forks at the front. This design helps to improve stability and handling, making them suitable for both city riding and more spirited rides on winding roads.

BMW G 310 R 2016

BMW G 310 R 2016

When it comes to the chassis, the BMW G 310 R has a steel frame, while the KTM 390 Duke boasts a chromium-molybdenum frame. The KTM's frame is known for its strength and rigidity, which enhances the bike's overall stability and handling.

In terms of braking, both bikes have single disk brakes at the front. This provides adequate stopping power, ensuring safety while riding. However, the BMW G 310 R has been noted to have a weakness in the brake pedal, which may require some adjustments or modifications for optimal performance.

In terms of dimensions and weights, both bikes have the same front and rear tire widths and diameters. However, the BMW G 310 R has a slightly longer wheelbase of 1374mm compared to the KTM 390 Duke's 1367mm. The seat height of the BMW G 310 R is also slightly lower at 785mm, while the KTM 390 Duke has a seat height of 800mm. These differences in dimensions may affect the overall riding experience and comfort for different riders.

KTM 390 Duke 2016

KTM 390 Duke 2016

When it comes to weight, the KTM 390 Duke has a significant advantage, weighing only 139kg with ABS compared to the BMW G 310 R's 158.5kg with ABS. This lower weight contributes to the KTM's high fun factor and nimble handling, making it a popular choice for riders who prioritize agility and maneuverability.

In terms of fuel tank capacity, both bikes have an 11-liter capacity, providing a decent range for city commuting and shorter rides.

In summary, the BMW G 310 R excels in handling, weight, ingenious chassis, and stability. On the other hand, the KTM 390 Duke stands out for its low weight, sufficient power, high fun factor, and low consumption. However, the BMW G 310 R has been noted to have a weakness in the brake pedal, while the KTM 390 Duke has been criticized for its sluggish clutch and small geometry. Ultimately, the choice between these two bikes will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.

Technical Specifications BMW G 310 R 2016 compared to KTM 390 Duke 2016

BMW G 310 R 2016
KTM 390 Duke 2016

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore80 mmBore89 mm
StrokeStroke62 mmStroke60 mm
Engine powerEngine power34 HPEngine power44 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power9,500 rpmRpm at Max. Power9,500 rpm
TorqueTorque28 NmTorque35 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque7,500 rpmRpm at Torque7,250 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio10.6 Compression Ratio12.6
StarterStarterElectricStarterElectric
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement313 ccmDisplacement373.2 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork

Suspension Rear

Shock mountShock mountdirectShock mountdirect

Chassis

FrameFrameSteelFrameChromium-molybdenum
Frame typeFrame typeTubularFrame typeTubular

Brakes Front

TypeTypeSingle diskTypeSingle disk

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width110 mmFront tyre width110 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width150 mmRear tyre width150 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height60 %Rear tyre height60 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,374 mmWheelbase1,367 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height785 mmSeat Height800 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)158.5 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)139 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity11 lFuel Tank Capacity11 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyA2License compliancyA2

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

BMW G 310 R 2016

BMW G 310 R 2016

On the first few metres, I briefly thought that the power was a bit lacking. However, after a while it quickly became clear that power is not everything and that ultimate driving pleasure can be guaranteed even with little horsepower. In the US, there are traffic rules called "lane splitting", which means moving forward between cars when there is a traffic jam. Before the traffic lights, for example. I have to admit that I didn't feel so comfortable here at the beginning. A Porsche on the left, a Dodge on the right, you really don't want to swerve with your bike. However, the handlebars of the BMW G310R are rather narrow and you can really cheat your way forward through the queues of cars without a second thought! The only shortcoming I noticed right at the start is the brake pedal. Unfortunately, it's a bit far down. The rear brake was also a little late in engaging. But that can certainly be optimised with an adjustment. All in all, it is a very successful bike. It is super versatile, really fun in every area and you feel comfortable from the first moment! Depending on the rev range you are in, you can adapt the bike to your riding style. Cruising at low revs and super sporty riding at high revs! The perfect all-round roadster at a great price.

Handling

weight

ingenious chassis

stability

Brake pedal

KTM 390 Duke 2016

KTM 390 Duke 2016

The KTM 390 Duke is a really good compromise between sportiness, reason, riding comfort, fun and price. Best of all: it doesn't feel like a compromise at all, but like it's ready to race.

Low weight

sufficient power

high fun factor

low consumption

Sluggish clutch

small geometry

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price BMW G 310 R vs KTM 390 Duke

There are a few key differences between a BMW G 310 R 2016 and a KTM 390 Duke 2016. Since model year 2016 1000PS.de editors have written 16 reviews for the BMW G 310 R and 33 reviews for the KTM 390 Duke since model year 2013. The first review for the BMW G 310 R was published on 10/7/2015 and now has more than 28,500 views. This compares to more than 26,300 views for the first review on KTM 390 Duke published on 11/12/2012.

Price BMW G 310 R

Model year
Current average market prices

Price KTM 390 Duke

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH