Suzuki V-Strom 650 2012 vs. Kawasaki Z900 2025

Suzuki V-Strom 650 2012

Suzuki V-Strom 650 2012

Kawasaki Z900 2025

Kawasaki Z900 2025

Loading...

Overview - Suzuki V-Strom 650 2012 vs Kawasaki Z900 2025

Suzuki V-Strom 650 2012

Suzuki V-Strom 650 2012

Kawasaki Z900 2025

Kawasaki Z900 2025

Technical Specifications Suzuki V-Strom 650 2012 compared to Kawasaki Z900 2025

Suzuki V-Strom 650 2012
Kawasaki Z900 2025

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore81 mmBore73.4 mm
StrokeStroke62.6 mmStroke56 mm
Engine powerEngine power67 HPEngine power124 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power8,800 rpmRpm at Max. Power9,500 rpm
TorqueTorque60 NmTorque97.4 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque6,400 rpmRpm at Torque7,700 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio11.5 Compression Ratio11.8
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesDOHC
DisplacementDisplacement645 ccmDisplacement948 ccm

Suspension Front

AdjustmentAdjustmentPreloadAdjustmentPreload, Rebound

Suspension Rear

AdjustmentAdjustmentPreloadAdjustmentPreload, Rebound

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameSteel
Frame typeFrame typeTwin-SparFrame typeDouble cradle

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
PistonPistonDouble pistonPistonFour pistons

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonSingle piston

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width110 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height80 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter19 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width150 mmRear tyre width180 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height70 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,290 mmLength2,065 mm
WidthWidth840 mmWidth830 mm
HeightHeight1,390 mmHeight1,075 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,555 mmWheelbase1,450 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height820 mmSeat Height830 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)220 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)213 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity22 lFuel Tank Capacity17 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Suzuki V-Strom 650 2012

Suzuki V-Strom 650 2012

Like the Kawasaki Versys, the small V-Strom is getting on a bit. The 1000 is so well done and easy to ride that you should consider taking the "big one" right away. In terms of versatility, however, the 650 is in no way inferior to the big V-Strom, and at a much lower price. But we wouldn't take it to the racetrack any more. And of course it has to cope with a heavy load more than a motorbike with 100+ hp.

Full torque

good sound

large tank

relaxed seating position

somewhat old-fashioned look

narrow handlebars

sluggish in bends

Kawasaki Z900 2025

Kawasaki Z900 2025

The new Z900 masters the balancing act between modernisation and proven virtues remarkably well. The 6-axle IMU, the precise quickshifter and the new electronics package make it technically absolutely up-to-date, while the characterful four-cylinder engine loses none of its fascination despite Euro 5+. The harmonious setup of all components is particularly impressive: whether suspension, engine or ergonomics - the overall package is just right.

Harmonious engine with impressive acceleration in the mid-range

very well functioning quickshifter with precise responsiveness

mature riding performance with a good compromise between stability and nimble handling

sensitive 6-axle IMU with harmonious control

superbly tuned seating position

excellent engine reponsiveness

confident cornering behaviour with transparent feedback from the front

harmonious electronics that do not restrict riding pleasure

smooth transmission with perfectly tuned ratios

first-class stop-and-go behaviour in city traffic

intuitive bike for beginners and experienced riders

slim waist despite four-cylinder layout

Great 5 inch display but the possibilities are not perfectly utilised with the Rideology app

licence plate holder seems a little carelessly integrated into the design

fuel consumption in practice significantly higher than factory specification (6.0-6.5l instead of 4.8l)

suspension of the basic version a little stiff on poor asphalt

promised app functions not yet available at the time of testing

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Suzuki V-Strom 650 vs Kawasaki Z900

Price Suzuki V-Strom 650

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Kawasaki Z900

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons