Beta Evo 290 2T 2011 vs. Beta Evo 300 2T 2016

Technical Specifications Beta Evo 290 2T 2011 compared to Beta Evo 300 2T 2016

Beta Evo 290 2T 2011

Beta Evo 300 2T 2016

Show all

Same only

Differences

Beta Evo 290 2T 2011

Beta Evo 300 2T 2016

Engine and Drive Train

Bore	Bore	78 mm	Bore	79 mm
Stroke	Stroke	60.5 mm	Stroke	60.5 mm
Compression Ratio	Compression Ratio	9.5	Compression Ratio	10.2
Clutch Type	Clutch Type	Multiplate in oil-bath	Clutch Type	Multiplate in oil-bath
Cylinders	Cylinders	1	Cylinders	1
Strokes	Strokes	2-Stroke	Strokes	2-Stroke
Displacement	Displacement	289.1 ccm	Displacement	296.4 ccm

Chassis

Frame	Frame	Aluminium	Frame	Aluminium
Frame type	Frame type	Twin Tube	Frame type	Twin Tube

Brakes Front

Piston	Piston	Four pistons	Piston	Four pistons

Brakes Rear

Type	Type	Disc	Type	Disc
Piston	Piston	Double piston	Piston	Double piston

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre diameter	Front tyre diameter	21 inch	Front tyre diameter	21 inch
Rear tyre diameter	Rear tyre diameter	18 inch	Rear tyre diameter	18 inch
Length	Length	1,990 mm	Length	1,990 mm
Width	Width	850 mm	Width	850 mm
Wheelbase	Wheelbase	1,305 mm	Wheelbase	1,305 mm
Seat Height	Seat Height	660 mm	Seat Height	660 mm
Dry Weight	Dry Weight	69 kg	Dry Weight	68.5 kg
Fuel Tank Capacity	Fuel Tank Capacity	2.6 l	Fuel Tank Capacity	2.6 l