Triumph Tiger 1050 SE 2013 vs. BMW R 1200 GS 2016

Triumph Tiger 1050 SE 2013

Triumph Tiger 1050 SE 2013

BMW R 1200 GS 2016

BMW R 1200 GS 2016

Loading...

Overview - Triumph Tiger 1050 SE 2013 vs BMW R 1200 GS 2016

Triumph Tiger 1050 SE 2013

Triumph Tiger 1050 SE 2013

BMW R 1200 GS 2016

BMW R 1200 GS 2016

Technical Specifications Triumph Tiger 1050 SE 2013 compared to BMW R 1200 GS 2016

Triumph Tiger 1050 SE 2013
BMW R 1200 GS 2016

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeBoxer
BoreBore79 mmBore101 mm
StrokeStroke71.4 mmStroke73 mm
Engine powerEngine power115 HPEngine power125 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power9,400 rpmRpm at Max. Power7,700 rpm
TorqueTorque98 NmTorque125 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque6,250 rpmRpm at Torque6,500 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12 Compression Ratio12.5
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeAntihopping
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionProp shaft
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders3Cylinders2
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingAir
DisplacementDisplacement1,050 ccmDisplacement1,170 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionTelescopic forkFront suspensionStrut
AdjustmentAdjustmentCompression, ReboundAdjustmentPreload

Suspension Rear

AdjustmentAdjustmentCompression, ReboundAdjustmentPreload

Chassis

Frame typeFrame typeTwin TubeFrame typeTwin Tube, Load-bearing engine

Brakes Front

PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonDouble pistonPistonDouble piston
Shock mountShock mountFloating caliperShock mountFloating caliper

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter19 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width180 mmRear tyre width170 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height60 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,110 mmLength2,207 mm
WidthWidth840 mmWidth953 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,510 mmWheelbase1,507 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height835 mmSeat Height850 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)245 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)238 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity20 lFuel Tank Capacity20 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Triumph Tiger 1050 SE 2013

Triumph Tiger 1050 SE 2013

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

BMW R 1200 GS 2016

BMW R 1200 GS 2016

A GS is at home almost anywhere - but only to a limited extent on the racetrack. It's a pleasure to feel the power of the partially water-cooled boxer twin cylinder on the exit of the bend - 125 hp only seems much weaker on paper than 150 or even 160 hp on the competition. With 125 Newton metres of torque, the acceleration from the bottom is superb anyway and the GS, at 238 kilos ready to ride, does not carry too much flab despite its bulky appearance. In very tight corners, the low centre of gravity also has a positive effect - the BMW R 1200 GS is very hard to crack! Even the front telelever suspension, which suppresses the front wheel's tendency to sink in under braking, fits perfectly into the GS's overall package and only slightly detracts from its sporty character.

powerful engine

low consumption

comfortable seating position

can also be used off-road

high reputation

Long and expensive surcharge side

Telelever front suspension takes some getting used to

Brake very sharp.

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Triumph Tiger 1050 SE vs BMW R 1200 GS

Price Triumph Tiger 1050 SE

Model year
Current average market prices

Price BMW R 1200 GS

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH