Husqvarna TE 250 2024 vs. KTM 250 EXC-F 2012

Husqvarna TE 250 2024

KTM 250 EXC-F 2012

Technical Specifications Husqvarna TE 250 2024 compared to KTM 250 EXC-F 2012

Husqvarna TE 250 2024

KTM 250 EXC-F 2012

Husqvarna TE 250 2024

KTM 250 EXC-F 2012

Engine and Drive Train

Bore	Bore	66.4 mm	Bore	76 mm
Stroke	Stroke	72 mm	Stroke	54.8 mm
Starter	Starter	Electric	Starter	Electric, Kick
Clutch Type	Clutch Type	Multiplate in oil-bath	Clutch Type	Multiplate in oil-bath
Cylinders	Cylinders	1	Cylinders	1
Strokes	Strokes	2-Stroke	Strokes	4-Stroke
Cooling	Cooling	liquid	Cooling	liquid
Displacement	Displacement	249 ccm	Displacement	248.6 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspension	Front suspension	Upside-Down telescopic fork	Front suspension	Upside-Down telescopic fork
Brand	Brand	WP	Brand	WP

Suspension Rear

Brand	Brand	WP	Brand	WP

Chassis

Frame	Frame	Chromium-molybdenum	Frame	Steel
Frame type	Frame type	Double cradle, Central tube	Frame type	Central tube

Brakes Rear

Type	Type	Disc	Type	Disc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre width	Front tyre width	90 mm	Front tyre width	90 mm
Front tyre height	Front tyre height	90 %	Front tyre height	90 %
Front tyre diameter	Front tyre diameter	21 inch	Front tyre diameter	21 inch
Rear tyre width	Rear tyre width	140 mm	Rear tyre width	120 mm
Rear tyre height	Rear tyre height	80 %	Rear tyre height	90 %
Rear tyre diameter	Rear tyre diameter	18 inch	Rear tyre diameter	18 inch
Seat Height	Seat Height	952 mm	Seat Height	985 mm
Dry Weight	Dry Weight	107 kg	Dry Weight	105.7 kg
Fuel Tank Capacity	Fuel Tank Capacity	8.5 l	Fuel Tank Capacity	9.2 l

Pros and Cons in comparison

Husqvarna TE 250 2024

It rides easier than its reputation. The powerful engine is easy to control. Unlike the 150, the 250 doesn't constantly push you to increase the revs. On the other hand, it loses a little of its playful character compared to the 150. The machine is a perfect choice for tough passages.

Practical chassis setup for a wide range of use

Precise lines

Low vibration level in the saddle

Robust overall appearance

Very practical details

Low weight

Great ergonomics in the saddle

Plenty of room to move on the bike

High-quality chassis

Light-footed overall impression

Engine does not have much power at low revs, but runs stable and predictable

2-stroke engine with really good engine tuning

Very good running culture from the engine

Very great performance on steep slopes - good traction, surprisingly low wheelie tendency

Plastics in the boot area quickly look very worn

Prices are normally always a matter of opinion - in this case, however, the whole range seems good but expensive

The recessed grip on the seat is too far forward

Stand has to be folded out a bit fiddly

A bit tiring to ride on longer passages

KTM 250 EXC-F 2012

On the trail, the supposedly small enduro stands its ground everywhere. It shines downhill with its low weight, in the lively passages it impresses with its excellent handling and on the connecting stages it glides through the terrain in a particularly energy-saving way.

High-quality equipment

improved details.

Correct gait needed for deep soils or steep slopes.

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Husqvarna TE 250 vs KTM 250 EXC-F

Price Husqvarna TE 250

Model year

Average market price

Current average market prices

Price KTM 250 EXC-F

Model year

Average market price

Current average market prices

Husqvarna TE 250 2024 vs. KTM 250 EXC-F 2012

Technical Specifications Husqvarna TE 250 2024 compared to KTM 250 EXC-F 2012

Engine and Drive Train

Suspension Front

Suspension Rear

Chassis

Brakes Rear

Dimensions and Weights

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Husqvarna TE 250 2024

KTM 250 EXC-F 2012

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Husqvarna TE 250 vs KTM 250 EXC-F

Price Husqvarna TE 250

Price KTM 250 EXC-F

1000PS Partner