KTM 690 Duke 2011 vs. Triumph Speed 400 2024

KTM 690 Duke 2011

KTM 690 Duke 2011

Triumph Speed 400 2024

Triumph Speed 400 2024

Loading...

Technical Specifications KTM 690 Duke 2011 compared to Triumph Speed 400 2024

KTM 690 Duke 2011
Triumph Speed 400 2024

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore102 mmBore89 mm
StrokeStroke80 mmStroke64 mm
Engine powerEngine power65 HPEngine power40 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power7,500 rpmRpm at Max. Power8,000 rpm
TorqueTorque67 NmTorque37.5 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque5,500 rpmRpm at Torque6,500 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio11.8 Compression Ratio12
StarterStarterElectricStarterElectric
Clutch TypeClutch TypeAntihoppingClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement654 ccmDisplacement398 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork

Chassis

FrameFrameChromium-molybdenumFrameSteel
Frame typeFrame typeTubularFrame typePerimeter

Brakes Front

PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons
Shock mountShock mountFixed caliperShock mountFixed caliper
TechnologyTechnologyradialTechnologyradial
BrandBrandBremboBrandBybre

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonSingle piston
Shock mountShock mountFloating caliperShock mountFixed caliper
BrandBrandBremboBrandBybre

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width110 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width160 mmRear tyre width150 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height60 %Rear tyre height60 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,472 mmWheelbase1,377 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height865 mmSeat Height790 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity13.5 lFuel Tank Capacity13 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA2

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

KTM 690 Duke 2011

KTM 690 Duke 2011

Are there so many people who don't need 100 hp to stabilise their ego? I think with previous single-cylinder models, it was always the design that was the problem, not the lack of power. The Duke manages to look really high-quality even as a small single-cylinder.

Stable frame

relatively low overall weight

good chassis

high-quality components

strong braking system

handling.

Significantly weaker single-cylinder engine

somewhat less comfort

somewhat less power.

Triumph Speed 400 2024

Triumph Speed 400 2024

The Speedy 400 is a really smart A2-class naked bike at a low price. The engine could be a little more agile, but the small Speed 400 offers a nice torque plateau in the mid-range. Thanks to its low weight, the handling is perfectly fine and the suspension offers an appropriate compromise between comfort and sport - with a tendency towards comfort. Although the brakes only have one disc at the front, they are really effective. Finally, the electronics also score points, with even a disengageable traction control system on board.

Attractive appearance

Easy to ride

Good ride comfort

Resilient engine

Comfortable seating position

Accessible for all rider types

Smooth running

Great workmanship for this class

Easy-to-read display

Pleasant acceleration

Good engine sound

Soft suspension

strong feedback on bumps

somewhat sluggish revving of the engine

nervousness at high speeds

lack of adjustable brake levers

soft seat cushion gives little feedback in curves

levers not adjustable

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price KTM 690 Duke vs Triumph Speed 400

Price KTM 690 Duke

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Triumph Speed 400

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH