SWM RS 300 R 2016 vs. Husqvarna TE 510 2009

SWM RS 300 R 2016

SWM RS 300 R 2016

Husqvarna TE 510 2009

Husqvarna TE 510 2009

Loading...

Overview - SWM RS 300 R 2016 vs Husqvarna TE 510 2009

SWM RS 300 R 2016

SWM RS 300 R 2016

Husqvarna TE 510 2009

Husqvarna TE 510 2009

Technical Specifications SWM RS 300 R 2016 compared to Husqvarna TE 510 2009

SWM RS 300 R 2016
Husqvarna TE 510 2009

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore83 mmBore97 mm
StrokeStroke55 mmStroke67.8 mm
StarterStarterElectricStarterElectric, Kick
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement298 ccmDisplacement510 ccm

Suspension Front

BrandBrandKayabaBrandSachs

Suspension Rear

BrandBrandKayabaBrandSachs

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter21 inchFront tyre diameter21 inch
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter18 inchRear tyre diameter18 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,495 mmWheelbase1,495 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height963 mmSeat Height963 mm
Dry WeightDry Weight107 kgDry Weight112 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity7.2 lFuel Tank Capacity7.2 l

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price SWM RS 300 R vs Husqvarna TE 510

Price SWM RS 300 R

Unfortunately, the data available to us is not sufficient to provide meaningful price information for this model.

Price Husqvarna TE 510

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH