Kawasaki Ninja 300 2016 vs. Yamaha R9 2025

Kawasaki Ninja 300 2016

Kawasaki Ninja 300 2016

Yamaha R9 2025

Yamaha R9 2025

Loading...

Overview - Kawasaki Ninja 300 2016 vs Yamaha R9 2025

Kawasaki Ninja 300 2016

Kawasaki Ninja 300 2016

Yamaha R9 2025

Yamaha R9 2025

Technical Specifications Kawasaki Ninja 300 2016 compared to Yamaha R9 2025

Kawasaki Ninja 300 2016
Yamaha R9 2025

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore62 mmBore78 mm
StrokeStroke49 mmStroke62.1 mm
Engine powerEngine power39 HPEngine power119 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power11,000 rpmRpm at Max. Power10,000 rpm
TorqueTorque27 NmTorque93 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque10,000 rpmRpm at Torque7,000 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio10.6 Compression Ratio11.5
StarterStarterElectricStarterElectric
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
IgnitionIgnitionDigitalIgnitionTransistor
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders2Cylinders3
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement296 ccmDisplacement890 ccm

Chassis

FrameFrameSteelFrameAluminium

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width110 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width140 mmRear tyre width180 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height70 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,015 mmLength2,070 mm
WidthWidth715 mmWidth705 mm
HeightHeight1,110 mmHeight1,180 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,405 mmWheelbase1,420 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height785 mmSeat Height830 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)174 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)195 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity17 lFuel Tank Capacity14 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyA2License compliancyA2, A

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Kawasaki Ninja 300 2016

Kawasaki Ninja 300 2016

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Yamaha R9 2025

Yamaha R9 2025

Even though the R9 has not become an uncompromising R6, it has a sporty character and performs well even on the race track and is a lot of fun to ride. Beginners will probably find it even easier to get to grips with on the track than an R6. On the other hand, the R9 with its high-torque engine and more relaxed riding position is much more suitable for everyday use, even if it naturally does not achieve the riding comfort of an MT09. And Yamaha has already shown that the new bike can also perform well on the race track with its opening victory in the Supersport World Championship. With its A2 suitability and favourable entry-level price, Yamaha has created a new approach to the everyday supersport bike, which is certainly also interesting for beginners.

Large usable power range

good automatic gearshift with extended functionality

suitable for road and racetrack use

integrated data recording

Narrow knee angle for tall riders

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Kawasaki Ninja 300 vs Yamaha R9

Price Kawasaki Ninja 300

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Yamaha R9

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH