Benelli TRK 702 X 2024 vs. Zontes 703F 2025

Benelli TRK 702 X 2024

Benelli TRK 702 X 2024

Zontes 703F 2025

Zontes 703F 2025

Loading...

Overview - Benelli TRK 702 X 2024 vs Zontes 703F 2025

Benelli TRK 702 X 2024

Benelli TRK 702 X 2024

Zontes 703F 2025

Zontes 703F 2025

Technical Specifications Benelli TRK 702 X 2024 compared to Zontes 703F 2025

Benelli TRK 702 X 2024
Zontes 703F 2025

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
Engine powerEngine power76.2 HPEngine power95 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power8,750 rpmRpm at Max. Power10,000 rpm
TorqueTorque68.2 NmTorque75 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque6,250 rpmRpm at Torque7,500 rpm
CylindersCylinders2Cylinders3
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement698 ccmDisplacement699 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
BrandBrandMarzocchiBrandMarzocchi
AdjustmentAdjustmentCompression, Preload, ReboundAdjustmentCompression, Preload, Rebound

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionSwing arm
AdjustmentAdjustmentCompression, Preload, ReboundAdjustmentCompression, Preload, Rebound

Chassis

FrameFrameSteelFrameAluminium

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABSAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width110 mmFront tyre width90 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height80 %Front tyre height90 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter19 inchFront tyre diameter21 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width150 mmRear tyre width150 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height70 %Rear tyre height70 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter18 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,492 mmWheelbase1,565 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height836 mmSeat Height845 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity20 lFuel Tank Capacity22 l

Equipment

EquipmentEquipmentLED daytime running lights, LED-Headlights, TFT displayEquipmentLED-Headlights

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Benelli TRK 702 X 2024

Benelli TRK 702 X 2024

The Benelli TRK 702X is an exciting alternative for anyone interested in entering the adventure bike segment. For an attractive price, the TRK 702X offers a lot of bike with technology that lasts. The TRK series has already won a lot of hearts, especially in Italy.

Lots of bike for an attractive price

Comfortable seating position for upper body

Good wind protection

Suitable for everyday use

Good range

Beautiful design

35kW throttleable

No quickshifter

No cruise control

Connectivity strange

Very steep knee angle

No clear suspension dimensions to be found from the manufacturer

Zontes 703F 2025

Zontes 703F 2025

The Zontes 703F Adventure is a Chinese adventure bike that is not far behind the established competition in the segment. For a really competitive price, it offers a lot, some special features, solid riding performance and good touring suitability. The only thing missing is some fine-tuning in the details, such as ABS or load changes in first gear. However, small weaknesses can be forgiven - measured in terms of value per euro. There is no other 95 Horsepower adventure bike with an Inline three-cylinder engine this cheap.

Extensive standard equipment: USB ports, electric windscreen, centre stand, heated grips, dashcams and more

independent three-cylinder engine with (almost always) smooth reponsiveness

well-balanced, fully adjustable Marzocchi suspension

good TFT display

high range

Unpleasant load changes in first gear

engine needs a lot of revs for sporty acceleration

front brakes need a lot of manual force for hard braking manoeuvres

not too fine ABS control behaviour

wind protection on the shoulders could be improved

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Benelli TRK 702 X vs Zontes 703F

Price Benelli TRK 702 X

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Zontes 703F

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons