Husqvarna TE 125 2016 vs. Husqvarna SM 125 S 2008

Husqvarna TE 125 2016

Husqvarna TE 125 2016

Husqvarna SM 125 S 2008

Husqvarna SM 125 S 2008

Loading...

Overview - Husqvarna TE 125 2016 vs Husqvarna SM 125 S 2008

Husqvarna TE 125 2016

Husqvarna TE 125 2016

Husqvarna SM 125 S 2008

Husqvarna SM 125 S 2008

Technical Specifications Husqvarna TE 125 2016 compared to Husqvarna SM 125 S 2008

Husqvarna TE 125 2016
Husqvarna SM 125 S 2008

Engine and Drive Train

TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes2-StrokeStrokes2-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement124.8 ccmDisplacement125 ccm

Dimensions and Weights

WheelbaseWheelbase1,471 mmWheelbase1,470 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height960 mmSeat Height870 mm
Dry WeightDry Weight96 kgDry Weight113.5 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity11 lFuel Tank Capacity10.2 l

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Husqvarna TE 125 2016

Husqvarna TE 125 2016

The beginner enduro for riders who want to do everything right from the start. Does not forgive shifting errors and always wants to be ridden in the right rev range. In 2017, the 125 was made even lighter - dry, the 125 weighs just 92 kg.

cheapest model

easy handling

best learning effect

Less forgiving of mistakes

limited engine power

Husqvarna SM 125 S 2008

Husqvarna SM 125 S 2008

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH