Husqvarna WR 250 2006 vs. Husqvarna TE 125 2016

Husqvarna WR 250 2006

Husqvarna WR 250 2006

Husqvarna TE 125 2016

Husqvarna TE 125 2016

Loading...

Overview - Husqvarna WR 250 2006 vs Husqvarna TE 125 2016

Husqvarna WR 250 2006

Husqvarna WR 250 2006

Husqvarna TE 125 2016

Husqvarna TE 125 2016

Technical Specifications Husqvarna WR 250 2006 compared to Husqvarna TE 125 2016

Husqvarna WR 250 2006
Husqvarna TE 125 2016

Engine and Drive Train

TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes2-StrokeStrokes2-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement249 ccmDisplacement124.8 ccm

Dimensions and Weights

WheelbaseWheelbase1,465 mmWheelbase1,471 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height965 mmSeat Height960 mm
Dry WeightDry Weight108 kgDry Weight96 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity10.2 lFuel Tank Capacity11 l

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Husqvarna WR 250 2006

Husqvarna WR 250 2006

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Husqvarna TE 125 2016

Husqvarna TE 125 2016

The beginner enduro for riders who want to do everything right from the start. Does not forgive shifting errors and always wants to be ridden in the right rev range. In 2017, the 125 was made even lighter - dry, the 125 weighs just 92 kg.

cheapest model

easy handling

best learning effect

Less forgiving of mistakes

limited engine power

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH