BMW S 1000 RR 2011 vs. Suzuki V-Strom 1000 2014

BMW S 1000 RR 2011

BMW S 1000 RR 2011

Suzuki V-Strom 1000 2014

Suzuki V-Strom 1000 2014

Loading...

Overview - BMW S 1000 RR 2011 vs Suzuki V-Strom 1000 2014

BMW S 1000 RR 2011

BMW S 1000 RR 2011

Suzuki V-Strom 1000 2014

Suzuki V-Strom 1000 2014

Technical Specifications BMW S 1000 RR 2011 compared to Suzuki V-Strom 1000 2014

BMW S 1000 RR 2011
Suzuki V-Strom 1000 2014

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore80 mmBore100 mm
StrokeStroke49.7 mmStroke66 mm
Engine powerEngine power192 HPEngine power100 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power13,000 rpmRpm at Max. Power8,000 rpm
TorqueTorque112 NmTorque103 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque9,750 rpmRpm at Torque4,000 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio13 Compression Ratio11.3
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath, AntihoppingClutch TypeAntihopping
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement999 ccmDisplacement1,037 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionTelescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameAluminium
Frame typeFrame typeTwin TubeFrame typeTwin-Spar

Brakes Front

PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons
TechnologyTechnologyradialTechnologyradial, Monoblock

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonSingle piston

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width110 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height80 %
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width190 mmRear tyre width150 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height70 %
LengthLength2,056 mmLength2,285 mm
WidthWidth826 mmWidth865 mm
HeightHeight1,138 mmHeight1,410 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,432 mmWheelbase1,555 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)207 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)228 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity17.5 lFuel Tank Capacity20 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

BMW S 1000 RR 2011

BMW S 1000 RR 2011

The most important changes to the S 1000 RR, however, were the numerous small adjustments to the chassis and geometry. Here we now benefit from thousands of test kilometres from the BMW test crew. This is logical evolution and a great step forward.

Improved driveability - optimised torque curve

plenty of power

strong engine

good traction point

immaculately functioning shift assist.

Accelerating load is very fatiguing.

Suzuki V-Strom 1000 2014

Suzuki V-Strom 1000 2014

In the large enduro segment, the Suzuki V-Strom 1000 occupies the position of the best value for money, yet you don't have to do without anything - even traction control and ABS come as standard. Excellent brakes, great comfort and a wonderfully powerful V-twin engine are ingredients that should appeal to almost everyone. The fact that it doesn't play in the top league with 100 hp is made up for by the wonderful power delivery, which ensures a relaxed climate on long journeys. Only the wind protection is not optimal with the original windshield; one should invest in the affordable, somewhat larger windshield.

Powerful engine

traction control as standard

very good brakes

taut yet comfortable chassis

great touring capability

complete instrumentation

Windshield creates turbulence on the head

the engine runs out of breath in the upper speed range

confusable look

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price BMW S 1000 RR vs Suzuki V-Strom 1000

Price BMW S 1000 RR

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Suzuki V-Strom 1000

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH