Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2012 vs. Yamaha Tracer 900 2016

Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2012

Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2012

Yamaha Tracer 900 2016

Yamaha Tracer 900 2016

Loading...

Overview - Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2012 vs Yamaha Tracer 900 2016

Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2012

Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2012

Yamaha Tracer 900 2016

Yamaha Tracer 900 2016

Technical Specifications Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2012 compared to Yamaha Tracer 900 2016

Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2012
Yamaha Tracer 900 2016

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore74 mmBore78 mm
StrokeStroke52.3 mmStroke59.1 mm
Engine powerEngine power106 HPEngine power115 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power11,700 rpmRpm at Max. Power10,000 rpm
TorqueTorque68 NmTorque87.5 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque9,100 rpmRpm at Torque8,500 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12 Compression Ratio11.5
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders3Cylinders3
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesDOHC
DisplacementDisplacement675 ccmDisplacement847 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionTelescopic fork

Chassis

Frame typeFrame typeTwin TubeFrame typeTwin Tube

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width180 mmRear tyre width180 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,030 mmLength2,160 mm
WidthWidth731 mmWidth950 mm
HeightHeight1,250 mmHeight1,345 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,410 mmWheelbase1,440 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height805 mmSeat Height845 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity17.4 lFuel Tank Capacity18 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2012

Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2012

All it takes is the slightest impulse and the little Englishwoman turns exactly the way you want it to. This manoeuvrability is also unparalleled in the class of medium-sized naked bikes. A motorbike that can be moved in such a sporty manner would not deserve to be abused as a mile-eater and travel steamer.

Less weight

improved performance

light-footed handling

extremely practical in curves

sitting upright.

Unincluded ABS - but not really expensive to buy.

Yamaha Tracer 900 2016

Yamaha Tracer 900 2016

Take two, pay one. With the MT-09 Tracer, you get almost a whole MT-09 with all its sportiness plus a touring bike that is suitable for everyday use and to some extent suitable for travelling, with decent comfort for all situations. Just remember that there are many more comfortable bikes in this category - but hardly any sportier ones. Easier to ride, easier to control with 3 riding modes, ABS and traction control as standard. Only the wind protection could be better and the seat for long distances can only be found in the accessories.

Sporty performance like all MT-09

3 riding modes

ABS and traction control as standard

taut chassis, plenty of lean angle clearance

Wind protection not optimal

seat could be more comfortable

handlebars too wide for the city

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Triumph Street Triple 675 R vs Yamaha Tracer 900

Price Triumph Street Triple 675 R

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Yamaha Tracer 900

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH