Husaberg TE 300 2012 vs. Suzuki RM-250 2009

Husaberg TE 300 2012

Suzuki RM-250 2009

Overview - Husaberg TE 300 2012 vs Suzuki RM-250 2009

Husaberg TE 300 2012

Suzuki RM-250 2009

Technical Specifications Husaberg TE 300 2012 compared to Suzuki RM-250 2009

Husaberg TE 300 2012

Suzuki RM-250 2009

Husaberg TE 300 2012

Suzuki RM-250 2009

Engine and Drive Train

Bore	Bore	72 mm	Bore	66.4 mm
Stroke	Stroke	72 mm	Stroke	72 mm
Transmission	Transmission	Chain	Transmission	Chain
Cylinders	Cylinders	1	Cylinders	1
Strokes	Strokes	2-Stroke	Strokes	2-Stroke
Displacement	Displacement	293.2 ccm	Displacement	249 ccm

Brakes Rear

Type	Type	Disc	Type	Disc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre width	Front tyre width	90 mm	Front tyre width	80 mm
Front tyre height	Front tyre height	90 %	Front tyre height	100 %
Front tyre diameter	Front tyre diameter	21 inch	Front tyre diameter	21 inch
Rear tyre width	Rear tyre width	140 mm	Rear tyre width	110 mm
Rear tyre height	Rear tyre height	80 %	Rear tyre height	90 %
Rear tyre diameter	Rear tyre diameter	18 inch	Rear tyre diameter	19 inch
Wheelbase	Wheelbase	1,475 mm	Wheelbase	1,465 mm
Seat Height	Seat Height	985 mm	Seat Height	950 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity	Fuel Tank Capacity	11 l	Fuel Tank Capacity	8 l

Pros and Cons in comparison

Husaberg TE 300 2012

The TE 300 was and remains a favourite, even in the new generation. Whether it's a special stage, narrow forest trials or endless steep slope climbs, the TE300 is never out of place. Simply a bike with which you can't go wrong.

Very wide range of applications

simple but solid two-stroke technology.

none

Suzuki RM-250 2009

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Husaberg TE 300 2012 vs. Suzuki RM-250 2009

Overview - Husaberg TE 300 2012 vs Suzuki RM-250 2009

Technical Specifications Husaberg TE 300 2012 compared to Suzuki RM-250 2009

Engine and Drive Train

Brakes Rear

Dimensions and Weights

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Husaberg TE 300 2012

Suzuki RM-250 2009

1000PS Partner