BMW S 1000 R 2023 vs. KTM 690 SMC R 2024

BMW S 1000 R 2023

BMW S 1000 R 2023

KTM 690 SMC R 2024

KTM 690 SMC R 2024

Loading...

Technical Specifications BMW S 1000 R 2023 compared to KTM 690 SMC R 2024

BMW S 1000 R 2023
KTM 690 SMC R 2024

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore80 mmBore105 mm
StrokeStroke49.7 mmStroke80 mm
Engine powerEngine power165 HPEngine power75 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power11,000 rpmRpm at Max. Power7,500 rpm
TorqueTorque114 NmTorque73.5 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque9,250 rpmRpm at Torque5,600 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12.5 Compression Ratio12.7
Throttle BoreThrottle Bore48 mmThrottle Bore50 mm
DisplacementDisplacement999 ccmDisplacement692 ccm

Suspension Front

DiameterDiameter45 mmDiameter48 mm
TravelTravel120 mmTravel215 mm

Suspension Rear

TravelTravel117 mmTravel240 mm

Chassis

RakeRake65.8 degreeRake63 degree
TrailTrail96 mmTrail107 mm

Brakes Front

DiameterDiameter320 mmDiameter320 mm

Brakes Rear

DiameterDiameter220 mmDiameter240 mm

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width190 mmRear tyre width160 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height60 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,450 mmWheelbase1,470 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height830 mmSeat Height890 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity16.5 lFuel Tank Capacity13.5 l
RangeRange266 kmRange329 km
Combined CO2 emissionsCombined CO2 emissions144 g/kmCombined CO2 emissions96 g/km
Combined fuel consumptionCombined fuel consumption6.2 l/100kmCombined fuel consumption4.1 l/100km
Stationary noiseStationary noise94 dBStationary noise90 dB

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

BMW S 1000 R 2023

BMW S 1000 R 2023

The seating position is sporty, but by no means uncomfortable, the brakes are powerful and the engine of the S 1000 R is at its best - perhaps even a little too homogeneous. There is also nothing to complain about on the riding side. Based on the pure performance data and the installed electronic features, the BMW probably has what it takes for the fastest lap time. And that on any kind of surface, because with the semi-active suspension you can eat up kilometre after kilometre on bad roads littered with potholes. Unfortunately, this feeling of superiority never really spilled over to the driver. Probably the downside of too much balance in all areas - at least in my Italophile eyes. The BMW lacked that certain something, the charisma, which is difficult to explain but arouses genuine emotions.

powerful engine

strong brakes

comfortable ergonomics

good standard equipment

extensive range of accessories

Sluggish shift assistant

optics not 100% coherent

KTM 690 SMC R 2024

KTM 690 SMC R 2024

A large, powerful single cylinder, a stable chassis, just over 160 kg of tractive weight and modern electronics for support - the key data alone suggests a lot of riding pleasure. In 2024, the SMC-R may be a little dusty in some respects and is no longer the undisputed queen of road-legal supermotos, but it can still offer a lot of supermoto fun and performance.

Powerful engine

Electronics can support safety or supermoto manoeuvres as required

Stable, fully adjustable suspension

Agile riding performance

Good ergonomics

Low fuel consumption

Great quickshifter

Old LC display and halogen headlights no longer up to date

Suspension could absorb small bumps more harmoniously

Brakes not overly sensitive

Price Comparison Average Market Price BMW S 1000 R vs KTM 690 SMC R

Price BMW S 1000 R

Model year
Current average market prices

Price KTM 690 SMC R

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons