BMW S 1000 R 2025 vs. Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2025

BMW S 1000 R 2025

BMW S 1000 R 2025

Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2025

Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2025

Loading...

Technical Specifications BMW S 1000 R 2025 compared to Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2025

BMW S 1000 R 2025
Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2025
BMW S 1000 R 2025
BMW S 1000 R 2025
Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2025
Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2025

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore80 mmBore78 mm
StrokeStroke49.7 mmStroke53.4 mm
Engine powerEngine power170 HPEngine power130 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power11,000 rpmRpm at Max. Power12,000 rpm
TorqueTorque114 NmTorque80 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque9,250 rpmRpm at Torque9,500 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12.5 Compression Ratio13.25
Fuel systemFuel systemInjectionFuel systemInjection
StarterStarterElectricStarterElectric
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath, AntihoppingClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath, Antihopping
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Transmission TypeTransmission TypeGearshiftTransmission TypeGearshift
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders4Cylinders3
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
ValvesValvesDOHC, Drag leverValvesDOHC
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement999 ccmDisplacement765 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
DiameterDiameter45 mmDiameter41 mm
TravelTravel120 mmTravel115 mm
AdjustmentAdjustmentCompression, Preload, ReboundAdjustmentCompression, Preload, Rebound

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionSwing arm
Shock absorberShock absorberMonoshockShock absorberMonoshock
TravelTravel117 mmTravel131 mm
AdjustmentAdjustmentCompression, Preload, ReboundAdjustmentCompression, Preload, Rebound
MaterialMaterialAluminiumMaterialAluminium

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameAluminium
Frame typeFrame typeTwin TubeFrame typeTwin Tube
RakeRake65.8 degreeRake23.2 degree
TrailTrail97.6 mmTrail96.9 mm

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
DiameterDiameter320 mmDiameter310 mm
PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons
Shock mountShock mountFixed caliperShock mountFloating caliper
ActuationActuationHydraulicActuationHydraulic
TechnologyTechnologyradialTechnologyradial, Monoblock

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
DiameterDiameter220 mmDiameter220 mm
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonSingle piston

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS, Hill start assist, Riding modes, Cornering ABS, Ride by Wire, Quickshifter, Traction control, Anti-wheelieAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS, Riding modes, Cornering ABS, Ride by Wire, Shift assistant with blipper, Traction control, Anti-wheelie

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width190 mmRear tyre width180 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
WidthWidth812 mmWidth792 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,447 mmWheelbase1,399 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height810 mmSeat Height836 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)199 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)188 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity16.5 lFuel Tank Capacity15 l
Top SpeedTop Speed250 km/hTop Speed235 km/h
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA
RangeRange266 kmRange277 km
Combined CO2 emissionsCombined CO2 emissions144 g/kmCombined CO2 emissions120 g/km
Combined fuel consumptionCombined fuel consumption6.2 l/100kmCombined fuel consumption5.4 l/100km
Stationary noiseStationary noise94 dBStationary noise95 dB

Equipment

EquipmentEquipmentLED-Headlights, TFT displayEquipmentLED daytime running lights, LED-Headlights, TFT display

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

BMW S 1000 R 2025

BMW S 1000 R 2025

The BMW S 1000 R will remain an uncompromising roadster for sporty, ambitious road riders in 2025. The BMW S 1000 R 2025 is not a bike for posers or warmists. It is a technical statement - crystal clear, precise and mercilessly efficient. Anyone who thinks naked bikes are tame all-rounders will be proven wrong here. If you are looking for a powerful naked bike with modern technology and distinct riding pleasure, the S 1000 R is an excellent choice.

Powerful acceleration in the low and medium rev range

Finely tuned riding aids, including standard MSR and optimised DTC

Automatic gearshift as standard, now also with improved function

Strong braking performance with ABS Pro, even when leaning

Improved ergonomics thanks to new short-stroke throttle grip

intuitive operating concept

powerful brakes with clear feedback

high riding stability

very good shifting behaviour

sensitive electronics

high-quality sports chassis

amazing suitability for everyday use

foolproof front-end feel

Vibrations in the handlebars

less sensitive suspension on small bumps

relatively loud mechanical sound

Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2025

Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2025

**Conclusion** The Triumph Street Triple RS impresses as a sporty naked bike with precise and stable riding performance, excellent brakes and a powerful three-cylinder engine. The comprehensive electronic equipment and high build quality round off the positive overall picture. Despite the tight setup and the necessary warm-up time for the tyres, the Street Triple RS offers an outstanding riding experience for riders with sporting ambitions. Minor weaknesses such as the cumbersome operation of the joystick and the moderate spray protection are more than compensated for by the bike's versatility and customisation options. Overall, the Street Triple RS is an excellent choice for those who value sporty precision and riding pleasure.

Engine power and revviness

precise and stable riding performance

excellent brakes

comprehensive electronic equipment

high build quality

good price-performance ratio

sporty suspension

classic-sporty seating position

versatile customisation options

strong character and sound of the engine.

Tyres need time to warm up

nervous turning at low temperatures

sharp brakes difficult to control for less experienced riders

awkward joystick operation

overloaded instrument displays - revs difficult to read

poor spray protection.

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price BMW S 1000 R vs Triumph Street Triple 765 RS

Price BMW S 1000 R

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Triumph Street Triple 765 RS

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

BMW S 1000 R 2021
VS.
BMW R 1250 R 2020

BMW S 1000 R 2021 vs
BMW R 1250 R 2020

MZ 1000 SF 2009
VS.
BMW S 1000 R 2021

MZ 1000 SF 2009 vs
BMW S 1000 R 2021

Suzuki GSX-R 1000 R 2022
VS.
BMW S 1000 R 2023

Suzuki GSX-R 1000 R 2022 vs
BMW S 1000 R 2023

Triumph Speed Triple 1200 RS 2021
VS.
Triumph Street Triple RS 2021

Triumph Speed Triple 1200 RS 2021 vs
Triumph Street Triple RS 2021

BMW S 1000 R 2021
VS.
Ducati Streetfighter V4 2020

BMW S 1000 R 2021 vs
Ducati Streetfighter V4 2020

Triumph Street Triple RS 2019
VS.
Triumph Speed Triple RS 2020

Triumph Street Triple RS 2019 vs
Triumph Speed Triple RS 2020

Honda VFR 800 F 2019
VS.
BMW S 1000 R 2021

Honda VFR 800 F 2019 vs
BMW S 1000 R 2021

Honda CB 1000 R 2019
VS.
BMW S 1000 R 2020

Honda CB 1000 R 2019 vs
BMW S 1000 R 2020

Suzuki GSX-S1000 2020
VS.
BMW S 1000 R 2020

Suzuki GSX-S1000 2020 vs
BMW S 1000 R 2020

BMW S 1000 R 2021
VS.
Honda CB 1000 R 2021

BMW S 1000 R 2021 vs
Honda CB 1000 R 2021

Suzuki Katana 2020
VS.
BMW S 1000 R 2020

Suzuki Katana 2020 vs
BMW S 1000 R 2020

Honda CB 1000 R 2015
VS.
BMW S 1000 R 2018

Honda CB 1000 R 2015 vs
BMW S 1000 R 2018

Yamaha MT-10 2020
VS.
BMW S 1000 R 2020

Yamaha MT-10 2020 vs
BMW S 1000 R 2020