Husqvarna SM 510R 2010 vs. GASGAS EC 300 2009

Husqvarna SM 510R 2010

Husqvarna SM 510R 2010

GASGAS EC 300 2009

GASGAS EC 300 2009

Loading...

Overview - Husqvarna SM 510R 2010 vs GASGAS EC 300 2009

Husqvarna SM 510R 2010

Husqvarna SM 510R 2010

GASGAS EC 300 2009

GASGAS EC 300 2009

Technical Specifications Husqvarna SM 510R 2010 compared to GASGAS EC 300 2009

Husqvarna SM 510R 2010
GASGAS EC 300 2009

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore97 mmBore72 mm
StrokeStroke67.8 mmStroke72 mm
StarterStarterElectricStarterKick
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes2-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement501 ccmDisplacement294.7 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter21 inch
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter18 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,445 mmWheelbase1,476 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height920 mmSeat Height945 mm
Dry WeightDry Weight120.5 kgDry Weight102 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity7.2 lFuel Tank Capacity9.5 l

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Husqvarna SM 510R vs GASGAS EC 300

Price Husqvarna SM 510R

Unfortunately, the data available to us is not sufficient to provide meaningful price information for this model.

Price GASGAS EC 300

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH