Kawasaki Ninja H2 SX SE 2025 vs. BMW M 1000 RR 2025

Kawasaki Ninja H2 SX SE 2025

BMW M 1000 RR 2025

Technical Specifications Kawasaki Ninja H2 SX SE 2025 compared to BMW M 1000 RR 2025

Kawasaki Ninja H2 SX SE 2025

BMW M 1000 RR 2025

Kawasaki Ninja H2 SX SE 2025

BMW M 1000 RR 2025

Engine and Drive Train

Engine type	Engine type	In line	Engine type	In line
Bore	Bore	76 mm	Bore	80 mm
Stroke	Stroke	55 mm	Stroke	49.7 mm
Engine power	Engine power	200 HP	Engine power	218 HP
Rpm at Max. Power	Rpm at Max. Power	11,000 rpm	Rpm at Max. Power	14,500 rpm
Torque	Torque	137.3 Nm	Torque	113 Nm
Rpm at Torque	Rpm at Torque	8,500 rpm	Rpm at Torque	11,000 rpm
Compression Ratio	Compression Ratio	11.2	Compression Ratio	14.5
Fuel system	Fuel system	Injection	Fuel system	Injection
Throttle Bore	Throttle Bore	40 mm	Throttle Bore	52 mm
Starter	Starter	Electric	Starter	Electric
Clutch Type	Clutch Type	Multiplate in oil-bath	Clutch Type	Multiplate in oil-bath, Antihopping
Transmission	Transmission	Chain	Transmission	Chain
Transmission Type	Transmission Type	Gearshift	Transmission Type	Gearshift
Number of gears	Number of gears	6	Number of gears	6
Cylinders	Cylinders	4	Cylinders	4
Strokes	Strokes	4-Stroke	Strokes	4-Stroke
Valves per cylinder	Valves per cylinder	4	Valves per cylinder	4
Valves	Valves	DOHC	Valves	DOHC
Cooling	Cooling	liquid	Cooling	liquid
Displacement	Displacement	998 ccm	Displacement	999 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspension	Front suspension	Upside-Down telescopic fork	Front suspension	Upside-Down telescopic fork
Diameter	Diameter	43 mm	Diameter	45 mm
Travel	Travel	120 mm	Travel	120 mm
Adjustment	Adjustment	Compression, Preload, Rebound	Adjustment	Compression, Preload, Rebound

Suspension Rear

Suspension	Suspension	Single swing arm	Suspension	Swing arm
Shock absorber	Shock absorber	Monoshock	Shock absorber	Monoshock
Travel	Travel	139 mm	Travel	118 mm
Adjustment	Adjustment	Compression, Preload, Rebound	Adjustment	Compression, Preload, Rebound
Material	Material	Aluminium	Material	Aluminium

Chassis

Frame	Frame	Steel	Frame	Aluminium
Frame type	Frame type	Tubular	Frame type	Twin Tube, Load-bearing engine
Rake	Rake	24.7 degree	Rake	66 degree
Trail	Trail	103 mm	Trail	102.5 mm

Brakes Front

Type	Type	Double disk	Type	Double disk
Diameter	Diameter	320 mm	Diameter	320 mm
Piston	Piston	Four pistons	Piston	Four pistons
Shock mount	Shock mount	Floating caliper	Shock mount	Floating caliper
Technology	Technology	radial, Monoblock	Technology	radial

Brakes Rear

Type	Type	Disc	Type	Disc
Diameter	Diameter	250 mm	Diameter	220 mm
Piston	Piston	Double piston	Piston	Single piston

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance Systems	Advanced Rider Assistance Systems	ABS, Hill start assist, Suspension electronically adjustable, Riding modes, Cornering ABS, Launch-Control, Ride by Wire, Shift assistant with blipper, Cruise control, Traction control	Advanced Rider Assistance Systems	ABS, Riding modes, Cornering ABS, Launch-Control, Ride by Wire, Shift assistant with blipper, Cruise control, Traction control, Anti-wheelie

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre width	Front tyre width	120 mm	Front tyre width	120 mm
Front tyre height	Front tyre height	70 %	Front tyre height	70 %
Front tyre diameter	Front tyre diameter	17 inch	Front tyre diameter	17 inch
Rear tyre width	Rear tyre width	190 mm	Rear tyre width	200 mm
Rear tyre height	Rear tyre height	55 %	Rear tyre height	55 %
Rear tyre diameter	Rear tyre diameter	17 inch	Rear tyre diameter	17 inch
Length	Length	2,175 mm	Length	2,085 mm
Width	Width	790 mm	Width	899 mm
Height	Height	1,260 mm	Height	1,197 mm
Wheelbase	Wheelbase	1,480 mm	Wheelbase	1,458 mm
Seat Height	Seat Height	835 mm	Seat Height	865 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)	Kerb Weight (with ABS)	267 kg	Kerb Weight (with ABS)	194 kg
Fuel Tank Capacity	Fuel Tank Capacity	19 l	Fuel Tank Capacity	16.5 l
License compliancy	License compliancy	A	License compliancy	A
Range	Range	351 km	Range	253 km
Combined CO2 emissions	Combined CO2 emissions	128 g/km	Combined CO2 emissions	151 g/km
Combined fuel consumption	Combined fuel consumption	5.4 l/100km	Combined fuel consumption	6.5 l/100km

Equipment

Equipment	Equipment	Connectivity, Heated grips, Cornering lights, LED-Headlights, TFT display	Equipment	LED-Headlights, TFT display

Pros and Cons in comparison

Kawasaki Ninja H2 SX SE 2025

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

BMW M 1000 RR 2025

The perfected supersport icon The BMW M 1000 RR is a technical masterpiece with 217 Horsepower, which paradoxically becomes a problem due to its perfection. Suitable for trackdays as standard with outstanding electronics and neutral riding dynamics, but difficult to customise. A supersports car that is surprisingly accessible to drive, but whose absolute perfection poses a dilemma for tuning enthusiasts: Do I buy the expensive, perfect M version or the cheaper S 1000 RR to customise myself? Ideal for purists, problematic for individualists.

Powerful four-cylinder engine

fine reponsiveness

excellent stability when trail braking and turning

precise riding performance

high braking stability

ergonomic seating position for sporty riding

high-quality, fully adjustable suspension components

suitable for direct use on the race track without modifications

impressive aerodynamics

high build quality and material quality

sophisticated electronics

neutral riding dynamics

surprising accessibility

perfect trackday suitability ex works

impressive braking performance

Very sporty ergonomics

very high purchase price

slight vibrations

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Kawasaki Ninja H2 SX SE vs BMW M 1000 RR

Price Kawasaki Ninja H2 SX SE

Model year

Average market price

Current average market prices

Price BMW M 1000 RR

Model year

Average market price

Current average market prices

Kawasaki Ninja H2 SX SE 2025 vs. BMW M 1000 RR 2025

Technical Specifications Kawasaki Ninja H2 SX SE 2025 compared to BMW M 1000 RR 2025

Engine and Drive Train

Suspension Front

Suspension Rear

Chassis

Brakes Front

Brakes Rear

Assistance Systems

Dimensions and Weights

Equipment

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Kawasaki Ninja H2 SX SE 2025

BMW M 1000 RR 2025

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Kawasaki Ninja H2 SX SE vs BMW M 1000 RR

Price Kawasaki Ninja H2 SX SE

Price BMW M 1000 RR

Alternative Comparisons

BMW M 1000 RR 2021 vs Ducati Panigale V4 R 2021

BMW M 1000 RR 2021 vs BMW HP4 RACE 2019

BMW M 1000 RR 2021 vs Honda CBR1000RR-R Fireblade 2020

BMW M 1000 RR 2023 vs BMW M 1000 R 2023

Kawasaki Ninja H2 SX SE+ 2021 vs Kawasaki Ninja H2 SX SE 2020

BMW M 1000 RR 2024 vs BMW S 1000 RR 2024

BMW M 1000 RR 2021 vs BMW S 1000 RR 2022

BMW S 1000 R 2023 vs BMW M 1000 RR 2021

BMW S 1000 XR 2023 vs BMW M 1000 RR 2022

Suzuki GSX 1300 R Hayabusa 2022 vs Kawasaki Ninja H2 SX SE 2022

Kawasaki Ninja H2 2020 vs BMW M 1000 RR 2021

BMW M 1000 RR 2022 vs Honda CBR1000RR-R Fireblade 2020

Ducati Panigale V4 S Corse 2019 vs BMW M 1000 RR 2021

BMW M 1000 RR 2021 vs
Ducati Panigale V4 R 2021

BMW M 1000 RR 2021 vs
BMW HP4 RACE 2019

BMW M 1000 RR 2021 vs
Honda CBR1000RR-R Fireblade 2020

BMW M 1000 RR 2023 vs
BMW M 1000 R 2023

Kawasaki Ninja H2 SX SE+ 2021 vs
Kawasaki Ninja H2 SX SE 2020

BMW M 1000 RR 2024 vs
BMW S 1000 RR 2024

BMW M 1000 RR 2021 vs
BMW S 1000 RR 2022

BMW S 1000 R 2023 vs
BMW M 1000 RR 2021

BMW S 1000 XR 2023 vs
BMW M 1000 RR 2022

Suzuki GSX 1300 R Hayabusa 2022 vs
Kawasaki Ninja H2 SX SE 2022

Kawasaki Ninja H2 2020 vs
BMW M 1000 RR 2021

BMW M 1000 RR 2022 vs
Honda CBR1000RR-R Fireblade 2020

Ducati Panigale V4 S Corse 2019 vs
BMW M 1000 RR 2021