BMW S 1000 R 2025 vs. BMW S 1000 RR 2010

BMW S 1000 R 2025

BMW S 1000 R 2025

BMW S 1000 RR 2010

BMW S 1000 RR 2010

Loading...

Technical Specifications BMW S 1000 R 2025 compared to BMW S 1000 RR 2010

BMW S 1000 R 2025
BMW S 1000 RR 2010

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore80 mmBore80 mm
StrokeStroke49.7 mmStroke49.7 mm
Engine powerEngine power170 HPEngine power192 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power11,000 rpmRpm at Max. Power13,000 rpm
TorqueTorque114 NmTorque112 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque9,250 rpmRpm at Torque9,750 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12.5 Compression Ratio13
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath, AntihoppingClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath, Antihopping
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders4Cylinders4
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement999 ccmDisplacement999 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionTelescopic fork

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionSwing arm

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameAluminium
Frame typeFrame typeTwin TubeFrame typeTwin Tube

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons
Shock mountShock mountFixed caliperShock mountFixed caliper
ActuationActuationHydraulicActuationHydraulic
TechnologyTechnologyradialTechnologyradial

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonSingle piston
Shock mountShock mountFloating caliperShock mountFloating caliper

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width190 mmRear tyre width190 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
LengthLength2,085 mmLength2,056 mm
WidthWidth812 mmWidth826 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,447 mmWheelbase1,432 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height810 mmSeat Height820 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)199 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)207 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity16.5 lFuel Tank Capacity17.5 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

BMW S 1000 R 2025

BMW S 1000 R 2025

The BMW S 1000 R will remain an uncompromising roadster for sporty, ambitious road riders in 2025. The BMW S 1000 R 2025 is not a bike for posers or warmists. It is a technical statement - crystal clear, precise and mercilessly efficient. Anyone who thinks naked bikes are tame all-rounders will be proven wrong here. If you are looking for a powerful naked bike with modern technology and distinct riding pleasure, the S 1000 R is an excellent choice.

Powerful acceleration in the low and medium rev range

Finely tuned riding aids, including standard MSR and optimised DTC

Automatic gearshift as standard, now also with improved function

Strong braking performance with ABS Pro, even when leaning

Improved ergonomics thanks to new short-stroke throttle grip

intuitive operating concept

powerful brakes with clear feedback

high riding stability

very good shifting behaviour

sensitive electronics

high-quality sports chassis

amazing suitability for everyday use

foolproof front-end feel

Vibrations in the handlebars

less sensitive suspension on small bumps

relatively loud mechanical sound

BMW S 1000 RR 2010

BMW S 1000 RR 2010

We have a strict and merciless order from the boss to thank for that. There are tough performance checks before the S 1000 RR leaves the factory. At BMW, they didn't want to show their hand and risk even one disappointing test bench report finding its way into the media.

Superior performance

well-functioning driving aids

very fast

optimal price.

Agility

complicated handling

braking stability

high weight.

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price BMW S 1000 R vs BMW S 1000 RR

Price BMW S 1000 R

Model year
Current average market prices

Price BMW S 1000 RR

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons