Husaberg TE 125 2012 vs. Husqvarna WR 125 2006

Husaberg TE 125 2012

Husaberg TE 125 2012

Husqvarna WR 125 2006

Husqvarna WR 125 2006

Loading...

Overview - Husaberg TE 125 2012 vs Husqvarna WR 125 2006

Husaberg TE 125 2012

Husaberg TE 125 2012

Husqvarna WR 125 2006

Husqvarna WR 125 2006

Technical Specifications Husaberg TE 125 2012 compared to Husqvarna WR 125 2006

Husaberg TE 125 2012
Husqvarna WR 125 2006

Engine and Drive Train

TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes2-StrokeStrokes2-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement124.8 ccmDisplacement125 ccm

Dimensions and Weights

WheelbaseWheelbase1,475 mmWheelbase1,465 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height990 mmSeat Height970 mm
Dry WeightDry Weight97 kgDry Weight99 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity11 lFuel Tank Capacity8.5 l

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Husaberg TE 125 2012

Husaberg TE 125 2012

The little one with the somewhat nervous temperament joined the Swedish family only last year. The 125 is certainly not the easiest Husaberg to ride, but if you can master the TE 125, you can master all the others.

Feather-light dry weight

nimble on the move.

Chassis needs getting used to

steep ascents complicated.

Husqvarna WR 125 2006

Husqvarna WR 125 2006

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Husaberg TE 125 vs Husqvarna WR 125

Price Husaberg TE 125

Unfortunately, the data available to us is not sufficient to provide meaningful price information for this model.

Price Husqvarna WR 125

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons