Suzuki RM-250 2009 vs. Husqvarna TC 250 2013

Suzuki RM-250 2009

Suzuki RM-250 2009

Husqvarna TC 250 2013

Husqvarna TC 250 2013

Loading...

Overview - Suzuki RM-250 2009 vs Husqvarna TC 250 2013

Suzuki RM-250 2009

Suzuki RM-250 2009

Husqvarna TC 250 2013

Husqvarna TC 250 2013

Technical Specifications Suzuki RM-250 2009 compared to Husqvarna TC 250 2013

Suzuki RM-250 2009
Husqvarna TC 250 2013

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore66.4 mmBore79 mm
StrokeStroke72 mmStroke50.9 mm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio10.6 Compression Ratio13.6
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes2-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement249 ccmDisplacement249 ccm

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width80 mmFront tyre width80 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height100 %Front tyre height100 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter21 inchFront tyre diameter21 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width110 mmRear tyre width100 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height90 %Rear tyre height90 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter19 inchRear tyre diameter19 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,465 mmWheelbase1,460 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height950 mmSeat Height985 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity8 lFuel Tank Capacity7 l

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Suzuki RM-250 vs Husqvarna TC 250

Price Suzuki RM-250

Unfortunately, the data available to us is not sufficient to provide meaningful price information for this model.

Price Husqvarna TC 250

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons