Suzuki RM-250 2009 vs. Husqvarna TC 250 2013

Suzuki RM-250 2009

Suzuki RM-250 2009

Husqvarna TC 250 2013

Husqvarna TC 250 2013

Loading...

Overview - Suzuki RM-250 2009 vs Husqvarna TC 250 2013

Suzuki RM-250 2009

Suzuki RM-250 2009

Husqvarna TC 250 2013

Husqvarna TC 250 2013

Technical Specifications Suzuki RM-250 2009 compared to Husqvarna TC 250 2013

Suzuki RM-250 2009
Husqvarna TC 250 2013

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore66.4 mmBore79 mm
StrokeStroke72 mmStroke50.9 mm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio10.6 Compression Ratio13.6
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes2-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement249 ccmDisplacement249 ccm

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width80 mmFront tyre width80 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height100 %Front tyre height100 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter21 inchFront tyre diameter21 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width110 mmRear tyre width100 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height90 %Rear tyre height90 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter19 inchRear tyre diameter19 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,465 mmWheelbase1,460 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height950 mmSeat Height985 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity8 lFuel Tank Capacity7 l

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Suzuki RM-250 vs Husqvarna TC 250

Price Suzuki RM-250

Unfortunately, the data available to us is not sufficient to provide meaningful price information for this model.

Price Husqvarna TC 250

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH