Husqvarna SM 450 R 2005 vs. Husqvarna TE 510 2009

Husqvarna SM 450 R 2005

Husqvarna SM 450 R 2005

Husqvarna TE 510 2009

Husqvarna TE 510 2009

Loading...

Overview - Husqvarna SM 450 R 2005 vs Husqvarna TE 510 2009

Husqvarna SM 450 R 2005

Husqvarna SM 450 R 2005

Husqvarna TE 510 2009

Husqvarna TE 510 2009

Technical Specifications Husqvarna SM 450 R 2005 compared to Husqvarna TE 510 2009

Husqvarna SM 450 R 2005
Husqvarna TE 510 2009

Engine and Drive Train

CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement449 ccmDisplacement510 ccm

Dimensions and Weights

WheelbaseWheelbase1,495 mmWheelbase1,495 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height885 mmSeat Height963 mm
Dry WeightDry Weight121 kgDry Weight112 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity9 lFuel Tank Capacity7.2 l

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Husqvarna SM 450 R 2005

Husqvarna SM 450 R 2005

In everyday use, experienced pilots immediately feel at ease and have a lot of fun zipping through the traffic. However, inexperienced pilots are somewhat overwhelmed by the spontaneous and sporty characteristics.

Supermoto geometry

handy chassis

high performance

rev-happy engine

Bicycle speedometer looks a bit rancid

reliability

not suitable for everyday use

Husqvarna TE 510 2009

Husqvarna TE 510 2009

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Husqvarna SM 450 R vs Husqvarna TE 510

Price Husqvarna SM 450 R

Unfortunately, the data available to us is not sufficient to provide meaningful price information for this model.

Price Husqvarna TE 510

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH