Honda CBF 1000 2010 vs. Triumph Tiger Sport 2014

Honda CBF 1000 2010

Honda CBF 1000 2010

Triumph Tiger Sport 2014

Triumph Tiger Sport 2014

Loading...

Overview - Honda CBF 1000 2010 vs Triumph Tiger Sport 2014

Honda CBF 1000 2010

Honda CBF 1000 2010

Triumph Tiger Sport 2014

Triumph Tiger Sport 2014

Technical Specifications Honda CBF 1000 2010 compared to Triumph Tiger Sport 2014

Honda CBF 1000 2010
Triumph Tiger Sport 2014

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore75 mmBore79 mm
StrokeStroke56.5 mmStroke71.4 mm
Engine powerEngine power98 HPEngine power125 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power8,000 rpmRpm at Max. Power9,400 rpm
TorqueTorque96 NmTorque104 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque6,500 rpmRpm at Torque4,300 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio11.1 Compression Ratio12
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders4Cylinders3
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement998 ccmDisplacement1,050 ccm

Chassis

Frame typeFrame typeBackboneFrame typeTwin Tube

Brakes Front

PistonPistonThree pistonsPistonFour pistons

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonDouble piston

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width160 mmRear tyre width180 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height60 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,155 mmLength2,150 mm
WidthWidth780 mmWidth835 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,480 mmWheelbase1,540 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height795 mmSeat Height830 mm
Kerb WeightKerb Weight250 kgKerb Weight235 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity19 lFuel Tank Capacity20 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Honda CBF 1000 2010

Honda CBF 1000 2010

As far as fun is concerned, the wicked look and slim shape of the CBF1000F at least already suggest that it won't fall by the wayside. A motorbike that can do so much that it may seem too ordinary to many. But a motorbike will never be that. That's what it boils down to: spurned at the pub, bought at the dealer.

Moped

beginner and re-entry friendly

easy handling

cockpit

looks

C-ABS

powerful engine.

without corners and edges

Triumph Tiger Sport 2014

Triumph Tiger Sport 2014

In direct comparison with its little sister, the Tiger 800 XC, the Tiger Sport 1050 can only score in one area: The brakes are extremely well-balanced and apply properly when you need them. In most other disciplines, however, it cannot prevail. Especially in handling, the big 1050 is much more stubborn than its little sister. Since it can't really be used off-road, its radius of action is much narrower than that of the Tiger 800 XC. However, if you are looking for a universal partner for the road, which, in addition to a comfortable riding position, should also offer a certain amount of sport, the Tiger Sport 1050 is certainly not the wrong choice.

Sporty and distinctive design

powerful three-cylinder engine

good sound

comfortable seating position

excellent brakes

stable chassis.

Stubborn handling in tight corners

not suitable for off-road use

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Honda CBF 1000 vs Triumph Tiger Sport

Price Honda CBF 1000

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Triumph Tiger Sport

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH