BMW G 310 R 2017 vs. Kawasaki Z H2 2022

BMW G 310 R 2017

BMW G 310 R 2017

Kawasaki Z H2 2022

Kawasaki Z H2 2022

Loading...

Overview - BMW G 310 R 2017 vs Kawasaki Z H2 2022

BMW G 310 R 2017

BMW G 310 R 2017

Kawasaki Z H2 2022

Kawasaki Z H2 2022

Technical Specifications BMW G 310 R 2017 compared to Kawasaki Z H2 2022

BMW G 310 R 2017
Kawasaki Z H2 2022

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore80 mmBore76 mm
StrokeStroke62 mmStroke55 mm
Engine powerEngine power34 HPEngine power200 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power9,500 rpmRpm at Max. Power11,000 rpm
TorqueTorque28 NmTorque137 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque7,500 rpmRpm at Torque8,500 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio10.6 Compression Ratio11.2
Fuel systemFuel systemInjectionFuel systemInjection
StarterStarterElectricStarterElectric
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Transmission TypeTransmission TypeGearshiftTransmission TypeGearshift
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders4
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesDOHC
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement313 ccmDisplacement998 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
DiameterDiameter41 mmDiameter43 mm
TravelTravel140 mmTravel120 mm

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionSwing arm
Shock absorberShock absorberMonoshockShock absorberMonoshock
Shock mountShock mountdirectShock mountUni Trak
TravelTravel131 mmTravel134 mm
MaterialMaterialAluminiumMaterialAluminium

Chassis

FrameFrameSteelFrameSteel
Frame typeFrame typeTubularFrame typeTubular
RakeRake64.9 degreeRake65.1 degree
TrailTrail102.3 mmTrail104 mm

Brakes Front

TypeTypeSingle diskTypeDouble disk
DiameterDiameter300 mmDiameter320 mm

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
DiameterDiameter240 mmDiameter250 mm

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABSAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS, Riding modes, Cornering ABS, Launch-Control, Ride by Wire, Quickshifter, Traction control, Anti-wheelie

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width110 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width150 mmRear tyre width190 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height60 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength1,988 mmLength2,085 mm
WidthWidth896 mmWidth810 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,374 mmWheelbase1,455 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height785 mmSeat Height830 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)158.5 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)239 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity11 lFuel Tank Capacity19 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyA2License compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

BMW G 310 R 2017

BMW G 310 R 2017

The BMW G 310 R scores with easy handling that should not overtax any beginner. The great responsiveness of the single cylinder makes it easy to control, and the low seat height gives a secure footing at traffic lights. For reasons of cost, savings were made in some corners, which unfortunately also becomes visible. In comparison, the workmanship is not on a par with the competition.

Smooth response

low seat height

pretty design

throaty sound

Individual components look cheap

Kawasaki Z H2 2022

Kawasaki Z H2 2022

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price BMW G 310 R vs Kawasaki Z H2

Price BMW G 310 R

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Kawasaki Z H2

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons