Husqvarna WR 300 2009 vs. Husaberg FE 390 2009

Husqvarna WR 300 2009

Husqvarna WR 300 2009

Husaberg FE 390 2009

Husaberg FE 390 2009

Loading...

Overview - Husqvarna WR 300 2009 vs Husaberg FE 390 2009

Husqvarna WR 300 2009

Husqvarna WR 300 2009

Husaberg FE 390 2009

Husaberg FE 390 2009

Technical Specifications Husqvarna WR 300 2009 compared to Husaberg FE 390 2009

Husqvarna WR 300 2009
Husaberg FE 390 2009

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore72 mmBore95 mm
StarterStarterKickStarterElectric, Kick
DisplacementDisplacement293 ccmDisplacement393.3 ccm

Suspension Front

BrandBrandSachsBrandWP

Suspension Rear

BrandBrandSachsBrandWP

Dimensions and Weights

Dry WeightDry Weight104 kgDry Weight114 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity9.5 lFuel Tank Capacity8.5 l

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Husqvarna WR 300 2009

Husqvarna WR 300 2009

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Husaberg FE 390 2009

Husaberg FE 390 2009

Who should buy it? All Enduro riders who are looking for a great Enduro and don't have to take any cubic capacity classifications into consideration. Anyone who is not looking for top performance and tenths of a second on the special stage will find the 390 the ideal motorbike.

Good driveability

agile

positive traction

comfortable, but not weak in the chest

stable

high-quality, immaculate equipment.

Acquisition price relatively high

performance is lacking on steep slopes with deep soil.

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH