Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016 vs. Kawasaki Z900 2020

Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016

Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016

Kawasaki Z900 2020

Kawasaki Z900 2020

Loading...

Overview - Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016 vs Kawasaki Z900 2020

The Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016 and the Kawasaki Z900 2020 are both naked bikes with similar engine types, in line four-cylinder engines. However, there are some notable differences between the two models.

In terms of engine power, the Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016 comes out on top with 149 HP, while the Kawasaki Z900 2020 falls slightly behind with 125.4 HP. The Suzuki also has a higher torque of 106 Nm compared to the Kawasaki's 98.6 Nm. These figures indicate that the Suzuki may offer a more powerful and responsive riding experience.

Both bikes feature fuel injection systems and liquid cooling, ensuring efficient and reliable performance. They also have the same number of cylinders, four, which contributes to their smooth and balanced power delivery.

In terms of suspension, both bikes feature upside-down telescopic forks at the front and swing arm suspension at the rear. The Suzuki offers more adjustability with compression, preload, and rebound adjustments for both the front and rear suspension, while the Kawasaki only offers preload and rebound adjustments. This means that the Suzuki may provide a more customizable and tailored riding experience.

Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016

Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016

In terms of chassis, the Suzuki features an aluminum frame with a twin tube design, while the Kawasaki has a steel frame with a double cradle design. The choice of materials and frame design can affect the bike's weight, handling, and overall stiffness. However, without further information, it is difficult to determine which frame design is superior.

Both bikes have double disk brakes at the front with four-piston calipers, providing excellent stopping power. However, the Suzuki has larger front brake discs with a diameter of 310 mm, compared to the Kawasaki's 300 mm discs. The Suzuki also utilizes radial technology for its front brakes, which can enhance braking performance and feel.

In terms of rider assistance systems, both bikes are equipped with ABS. However, the Kawasaki Z900 2020 offers additional advanced rider assistance systems such as riding modes, ride by wire, and traction control. These features can enhance the bike's performance and safety in various riding conditions.

In terms of dimensions and weights, both bikes have similar front and rear tire widths and diameters. The Suzuki has a slightly longer wheelbase of 1460 mm compared to the Kawasaki's 1450 mm. The seat height of the Suzuki is also slightly higher at 815 mm compared to the Kawasaki's 795 mm. Both bikes have a similar kerb weight of around 210 kg with ABS.

Kawasaki Z900 2020

Kawasaki Z900 2020

In terms of strengths, the Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016 is praised for its powerful engine, good braking control, stable and sensitive chassis, comfortable seating position, and relatively low price. On the other hand, the Kawasaki Z900 2020 is commended for its powerful four-cylinder engine, great handling, good equipment, aggressive looks, and value for money.

However, the Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016 has been criticized for its front end appearance, which some may find too aggressive. It has also been noted that the throttle response in the lower rev range can be overly sensitive, potentially causing a jerky riding experience.

In comparison, the Kawasaki Z900 2020 has been criticized for its menu navigation, which some riders may find tiring or cumbersome to navigate. Additionally, it lacks the option for a quickshifter, which can be a desirable feature for some riders.

Overall, both the Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016 and the Kawasaki Z900 2020 offer powerful naked bikes with their own unique strengths and weaknesses. The choice between the two would ultimately depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.

Technical Specifications Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016 compared to Kawasaki Z900 2020

Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016
Kawasaki Z900 2020

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore73.4 mmBore73.4 mm
StrokeStroke59 mmStroke56 mm
Engine powerEngine power149 HPEngine power125.4 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power10,000 rpmRpm at Max. Power9,500 rpm
TorqueTorque106 NmTorque98.6 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque9,500 rpmRpm at Torque7,700 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12.2 Compression Ratio11.8
Fuel systemFuel systemInjectionFuel systemInjection
Throttle BoreThrottle Bore44 mmThrottle Bore36 mm
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Transmission TypeTransmission TypeGearshiftTransmission TypeGearshift
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders4Cylinders4
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesDOHC
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement999 ccmDisplacement948 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
DiameterDiameter43 mmDiameter41 mm
TravelTravel120 mmTravel120 mm
AdjustmentAdjustmentCompression, Preload, ReboundAdjustmentPreload, Rebound

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionSwing arm
Shock absorberShock absorberMonoshockShock absorberMonoshock
Shock mountShock mountDeflectionShock mountDeflection
TravelTravel130 mmTravel140 mm
AdjustmentAdjustmentPreload, ReboundAdjustmentPreload, Rebound

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameSteel
Frame typeFrame typeTwin TubeFrame typeDouble cradle

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
DiameterDiameter310 mmDiameter300 mm
PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons
TechnologyTechnologyradialTechnologyPetal

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
DiameterDiameter250 mmDiameter250 mm
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonSingle piston

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABSAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS, Riding modes, Ride by Wire, Traction control

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width190 mmRear tyre width180 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height50 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,115 mmLength2,070 mm
WidthWidth795 mmWidth820 mm
HeightHeight1,080 mmHeight1,065 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,460 mmWheelbase1,450 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height815 mmSeat Height795 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)209 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)210 kg
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016

Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016

Some might be surprised that after waiting so long, Suzuki did not launch the ultimate, uncompromising power naked bike. Instead, the Suzuki GSX-S 1000 with its 149 hp seems almost too well-behaved. But once you ride it on the race track, you quickly realise that the engine is far more powerful in real life and that the rest of the performance of the chassis and braking system is also impressive. In return, it also offers a large portion of everyday and practical suitability - not bad ingredients when you have to cover everything from everyday to race track with a single bike.

Powerful engine

good braking control

stable and sensitive chassis

comfortable seating position

relatively low price.

Front end looks too good

toxic throttle response in the lower rev range

Kawasaki Z900 2020

Kawasaki Z900 2020

In terms of price-performance, the Kawasaki Z900 is hard to beat at the moment. With the perfectly tuned engine, the high-quality chassis components and the electronics added for 2020, this naked bike offers everything that sporty riders will be looking for. There is really nothing to complain about, even if the option of a quickshifter would have been a nice extra. Apart from that: great shot, Kawasaki!

powerful four-cylinder

great handling

good equipment

aggressive looks

value for money

Menu navigation somewhat tiring

missing quickshifter option

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Suzuki GSX-S1000 vs Kawasaki Z900

There are a few key differences between a Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016 and a Kawasaki Z900 2020. In terms of price, the actual average price of a Kawasaki Z900 2020 is about 2% higher. Compared to Kawasaki Z900 2020 there are less Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 10 compared to 34. It takes less time to sell a Suzuki GSX-S1000 with 109 days compared to 124 days for a Kawasaki Z900. Since model year 2015 1000PS.de editors have written 36 reviews for the Suzuki GSX-S1000 and 46 reviews for the Kawasaki Z900 since model year 2017. The first review for the Suzuki GSX-S1000 was published on 9/27/2014 and now has more than 17,100 views. This compares to more than 93,200 views for the first review on Kawasaki Z900 published on 11/11/2016.

Price Suzuki GSX-S1000

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Kawasaki Z900

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH