BMW S 1000 RR 2016 vs. Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade 2014

BMW S 1000 RR 2016

BMW S 1000 RR 2016

Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade 2014

Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade 2014

Loading...

Overview - BMW S 1000 RR 2016 vs Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade 2014

BMW S 1000 RR 2016

BMW S 1000 RR 2016

Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade 2014

Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade 2014

Technical Specifications BMW S 1000 RR 2016 compared to Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade 2014

BMW S 1000 RR 2016
Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade 2014

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore80 mmBore76 mm
StrokeStroke49.7 mmStroke55.1 mm
Engine powerEngine power199 HPEngine power181 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power13,500 rpmRpm at Max. Power12,250 rpm
TorqueTorque113 NmTorque114 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque10,500 rpmRpm at Torque10,500 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio13 Compression Ratio12.3
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath, AntihoppingClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders4Cylinders4
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement999 ccmDisplacement999.8 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionTelescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameAluminium
Frame typeFrame typeTwin TubeFrame typeTwin Tube

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons
TechnologyTechnologyradialTechnologyradial, Monoblock

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonSingle piston

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width190 mmRear tyre width190 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height50 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,050 mmLength2,077 mm
WidthWidth826 mmWidth685 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,425 mmWheelbase1,407 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height815 mmSeat Height820 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)204 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)211 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity17.5 lFuel Tank Capacity17.5 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

BMW S 1000 RR 2016

BMW S 1000 RR 2016

The S 1000 RR is the universal talent among the superbikes - you sit on it and feel comfortable straight away. Although it seems a bit nervous in comparison in terms of chassis and stability. However, it converts this into pleasantly easy handling and impresses with its enormous engine power. The front wheel is indeed particularly light and has to be calmed by the steering damper. An incredibly sporty and at the same time comfortable feature is the shift assistant for upshifting and downshifting - this brings calm to the chassis and you can fully concentrate on driving.

Very powerful engine

comfortable seating position

excellent shift assistant

somewhat sluggish in curves

Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade 2014

Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade 2014

Those who focus on good lap times will not find the CBR 1000 RR the best partner in the field. Those who simply want to ride nice laps around the ring or on the country road will still have fun with it. It rides heart-stoppingly, looks great and gives you a lot of feeling for the rear wheel. At the regulars' table, Honda fans can at least score points with Marquez's victories, but they won't be able to come up with the Fireblade's fabulous performance figures or lap records.

great look

transparent handling

good feeling for traction

high-quality chassis

great basis for racetrack conversion

reliable and proven technology

Peak power no longer up to date

lack of traction control

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price BMW S 1000 RR vs Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade

Price BMW S 1000 RR

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons