Yamaha R3 2016 vs. BMW S 1000 R 2023

Yamaha R3 2016

Yamaha R3 2016

BMW S 1000 R 2023

BMW S 1000 R 2023

Loading...

Overview - Yamaha R3 2016 vs BMW S 1000 R 2023

Yamaha R3 2016

Yamaha R3 2016

BMW S 1000 R 2023

BMW S 1000 R 2023

Technical Specifications Yamaha R3 2016 compared to BMW S 1000 R 2023

Yamaha R3 2016
BMW S 1000 R 2023

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore68 mmBore80 mm
StrokeStroke44.1 mmStroke49.7 mm
Engine powerEngine power42 HPEngine power165 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power10,750 rpmRpm at Max. Power11,000 rpm
TorqueTorque29.6 NmTorque114 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque9,000 rpmRpm at Torque9,250 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio11.2 Compression Ratio12.5
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath, Antihopping
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders2Cylinders4
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesDOHC, Drag lever
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement321 ccmDisplacement999 ccm

Chassis

Frame typeFrame typeTwin TubeFrame typeTwin Tube

Brakes Front

TypeTypeSingle diskTypeDouble disk

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABSAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS, Hill start assist, Riding modes, Cornering ABS, Ride by Wire, Quickshifter, Traction control, Anti-wheelie

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width110 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width140 mmRear tyre width190 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height70 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,090 mmLength2,090 mm
WidthWidth720 mmWidth812 mm
HeightHeight1,135 mmHeight1,115 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,380 mmWheelbase1,450 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height780 mmSeat Height830 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)169 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)199 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity14 lFuel Tank Capacity16.5 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyA2License compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Yamaha R3 2016

Yamaha R3 2016

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

BMW S 1000 R 2023

BMW S 1000 R 2023

The seating position is sporty, but by no means uncomfortable, the brakes are powerful and the engine of the S 1000 R is at its best - perhaps even a little too homogeneous. There is also nothing to complain about on the riding side. Based on the pure performance data and the installed electronic features, the BMW probably has what it takes for the fastest lap time. And that on any kind of surface, because with the semi-active suspension you can eat up kilometre after kilometre on bad roads littered with potholes. Unfortunately, this feeling of superiority never really spilled over to the driver. Probably the downside of too much balance in all areas - at least in my Italophile eyes. The BMW lacked that certain something, the charisma, which is difficult to explain but arouses genuine emotions.

powerful engine

strong brakes

comfortable ergonomics

good standard equipment

extensive range of accessories

Sluggish shift assistant

optics not 100% coherent

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Yamaha R3 vs BMW S 1000 R

Price Yamaha R3

Model year
Current average market prices

Price BMW S 1000 R

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH