Kawasaki ER-6f 2016 vs. CFMOTO 400 NK 2017

Kawasaki ER-6f 2016

Kawasaki ER-6f 2016

CFMOTO 400 NK 2017

CFMOTO 400 NK 2017

Loading...

Technical Specifications Kawasaki ER-6f 2016 compared to CFMOTO 400 NK 2017

Kawasaki ER-6f 2016
CFMOTO 400 NK 2017
Kawasaki ER-6f 2016
Kawasaki ER-6f 2016
CFMOTO 400 NK 2017
CFMOTO 400 NK 2017

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
Engine powerEngine power72 HPEngine power41.5 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power8,500 rpmRpm at Max. Power9,500 rpm
TorqueTorque64 NmTorque34.4 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque7,000 rpmRpm at Torque7,650 rpm
IgnitionIgnitionDigitalIgnitionECU
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders2Cylinders2
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement649 ccmDisplacement400.4 ccm

Suspension Rear

Shock absorberShock absorberMonoshockShock absorberMonoshock

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width160 mmRear tyre width160 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height60 %Rear tyre height60 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,110 mmLength2,114 mm
WidthWidth770 mmWidth757 mm
HeightHeight1,180 mmHeight1,100 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,410 mmWheelbase1,415 mm
Kerb WeightKerb Weight209 kgKerb Weight206 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity16 lFuel Tank Capacity17 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA2

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Kawasaki ER-6f 2016

Kawasaki ER-6f 2016

Regardless of whether you take it on the dull way to work or on extended tours, the comfortable seating position, the quiet, low-vibration in-line two-cylinder and the agility in the angular movement bring riding pleasure in every situation.

Powerful sound

mobility

reasonable price

visually sophisticated

safe riding experience

(re-)beginner-friendly.

72 hp does not tear legs out

CFMOTO 400 NK 2017

CFMOTO 400 NK 2017

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Price Comparison Average Market Price Kawasaki ER-6f vs CFMOTO 400 NK

Price Kawasaki ER-6f

Model year
Current average market prices

Price CFMOTO 400 NK

Unfortunately, the data available to us is not sufficient to provide meaningful price information for this model.

Alternative Comparisons

CF-Moto 400 NK 2021
VS.
CF-Moto 650 NK 2021

CF-Moto 400 NK 2021 vs
CF-Moto 650 NK 2021

CFMOTO 400 NK 2021
VS.
Zontes 350 GK 2022

CFMOTO 400 NK 2021 vs
Zontes 350 GK 2022

Kawasaki ER-6f 2011
VS.
Kawasaki Ninja 650 2018

Kawasaki ER-6f 2011 vs
Kawasaki Ninja 650 2018

Kawasaki ER-6f 2010
VS.
Kawasaki Ninja 650 2020

Kawasaki ER-6f 2010 vs
Kawasaki Ninja 650 2020

Kawasaki Ninja 650 2021
VS.
Kawasaki ER-6f 2012

Kawasaki Ninja 650 2021 vs
Kawasaki ER-6f 2012

Kawasaki Ninja 650 2017
VS.
Kawasaki ER-6f 2015

Kawasaki Ninja 650 2017 vs
Kawasaki ER-6f 2015

Kawasaki ER-6f 2014
VS.
Kawasaki Z1000SX 2016

Kawasaki ER-6f 2014 vs
Kawasaki Z1000SX 2016

Kawasaki ER-6f 2008
VS.
Kawasaki ER-6n 2014

Kawasaki ER-6f 2008 vs
Kawasaki ER-6n 2014

Kawasaki ER-6f 2006
VS.
Honda CBR650R 2021

Kawasaki ER-6f 2006 vs
Honda CBR650R 2021

Kawasaki ER-6f 2008
VS.
Kawasaki Z 650 2020

Kawasaki ER-6f 2008 vs
Kawasaki Z 650 2020

Honda CBF 600 2010
VS.
Kawasaki ER-6f 2008

Honda CBF 600 2010 vs
Kawasaki ER-6f 2008

CFMOTO 400 NK 2022
VS.
CFMOTO 650 NK 2022

CFMOTO 400 NK 2022 vs
CFMOTO 650 NK 2022

CF-Moto 400 NK 2021
VS.
KTM 390 Duke 2021

CF-Moto 400 NK 2021 vs
KTM 390 Duke 2021