KTM 1290 Super Duke R EVO 2023 vs. BMW S 1000 RR 2010

KTM 1290 Super Duke R EVO 2023

KTM 1290 Super Duke R EVO 2023

BMW S 1000 RR 2010

BMW S 1000 RR 2010

Loading...

Overview - KTM 1290 Super Duke R EVO 2023 vs BMW S 1000 RR 2010

KTM 1290 Super Duke R EVO 2023

KTM 1290 Super Duke R EVO 2023

BMW S 1000 RR 2010

BMW S 1000 RR 2010

Technical Specifications KTM 1290 Super Duke R EVO 2023 compared to BMW S 1000 RR 2010

KTM 1290 Super Duke R EVO 2023
BMW S 1000 RR 2010

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeVEngine typeIn line
BoreBore108 mmBore80 mm
StrokeStroke71 mmStroke49.7 mm
Engine powerEngine power180 HPEngine power192 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power9,500 rpmRpm at Max. Power13,000 rpm
TorqueTorque140 NmTorque112 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque8,000 rpmRpm at Torque9,750 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio13.5 Compression Ratio13
Clutch TypeClutch TypeAntihoppingClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath, Antihopping
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders2Cylinders4
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement1,301 ccmDisplacement999 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionTelescopic fork

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSingle swing armSuspensionSwing arm

Chassis

FrameFrameChromium-molybdenumFrameAluminium
Frame typeFrame typeTubularFrame typeTwin Tube

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons
Shock mountShock mountFixed caliperShock mountFixed caliper
ActuationActuationHydraulicActuationHydraulic
TechnologyTechnologyradial, MonoblockTechnologyradial

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonDouble pistonPistonSingle piston
Shock mountShock mountFixed caliperShock mountFloating caliper

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width200 mmRear tyre width190 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
WheelbaseWheelbase1,497 mmWheelbase1,432 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height835 mmSeat Height820 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)211 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)207 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity16 lFuel Tank Capacity17.5 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

KTM 1290 Super Duke R EVO 2023

KTM 1290 Super Duke R EVO 2023

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

BMW S 1000 RR 2010

BMW S 1000 RR 2010

We have a strict and merciless order from the boss to thank for that. There are tough performance checks before the S 1000 RR leaves the factory. At BMW, they didn't want to show their hand and risk even one disappointing test bench report finding its way into the media.

Superior performance

well-functioning driving aids

very fast

optimal price.

Agility

complicated handling

braking stability

high weight.

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price KTM 1290 Super Duke R EVO vs BMW S 1000 RR

Price KTM 1290 Super Duke R EVO

Model year
Current average market prices

Price BMW S 1000 RR

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons