Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013 vs. Kawasaki Z 750 2009

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013

Kawasaki Z 750 2009

Kawasaki Z 750 2009

Loading...

Overview - Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013 vs Kawasaki Z 750 2009

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013

Kawasaki Z 750 2009

Kawasaki Z 750 2009

Technical Specifications Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013 compared to Kawasaki Z 750 2009

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013
Kawasaki Z 750 2009

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore79 mmBore68.4 mm
StrokeStroke71.4 mmStroke50.9 mm
Engine powerEngine power135 HPEngine power106 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power9,400 rpmRpm at Max. Power10,500 rpm
TorqueTorque111 NmTorque78 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque7,750 rpmRpm at Torque8,300 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12 Compression Ratio11.3
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders3Cylinders4
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement1,050 ccmDisplacement748 ccm

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameSteel
Frame typeFrame typeTwin TubeFrame typeTwin Tube

Brakes Front

PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonDouble piston
Shock mountShock mountFixed caliperShock mountFloating caliper
TechnologyTechnologyradialTechnologyPetal

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonDouble pistonPistonSingle piston
Shock mountShock mountFloating caliperShock mountFloating caliper

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
WidthWidth795 mmWidth805 mm
HeightHeight1,110 mmHeight1,100 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,435 mmWheelbase1,440 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height825 mmSeat Height815 mm
Kerb WeightKerb Weight214 kgKerb Weight226 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity17.5 lFuel Tank Capacity18.5 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013

More power, more kilos, more rubber . It is certainly not the most manageable, which makes climbing the Tyrolean mountains over hundreds of hairpin bends exhausting at times. But it is more mature than the Street Triple, knows how to glide along the valley smoothly and without getting on your nerves, and for some reason feels more trustworthy and secure.

Powerful three-cylinder engine

sporty driving feel

upright seating

stable frame.

Showa suspension elements slightly uncomfortable

stubborn handling.

Kawasaki Z 750 2009

Kawasaki Z 750 2009

A good bike at a very good price, especially the upside-down fork is convincing.

improved torque curve

upside-down fork

aggressive engine

low price

high weight

4 hp less than the predecessor

not exactly effortless driving

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Triumph Speed Triple 1050 vs Kawasaki Z 750

Price Triumph Speed Triple 1050

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Kawasaki Z 750

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH