Magazine
Brands
Top Awards
Compare
About us
Home
Primerjava
Aprilia RS 457 2023 vs. Yamaha R3 2022
Beta Ark 50 LC 2017 vs. Piaggio Zip 50 2T 2009
Beta Ark 50 LC 2017
Piaggio Zip 50 2T 2009
Loading...
Overview - Beta Ark 50 LC 2017 vs Piaggio Zip 50 2T 2009
Beta Ark 50 LC 2017
Piaggio Zip 50 2T 2009
Technical Specifications Beta Ark 50 LC 2017 compared to Piaggio Zip 50 2T 2009
Beta Ark 50 LC 2017
Piaggio Zip 50 2T 2009
Show all
Same only
Differences
Beta Ark 50 LC 2017
Piaggio Zip 50 2T 2009
Engine and Drive Train
Transmission Type
Transmission Type
Variomatic
Transmission Type
Automatic
Strokes
Strokes
2-Stroke
Strokes
4-Stroke
Cooling
Cooling
liquid
Cooling
Air
Displacement
Displacement
49 ccm
Displacement
50 ccm
Brakes Rear
Type
Type
Disc
Type
Drum
Dimensions and Weights
Length
Length
1,740 mm
Length
1,700 mm
Seat Height
Seat Height
830 mm
Seat Height
750 mm
Dry Weight
Dry Weight
88 kg
Dry Weight
95 kg
Fuel Tank Capacity
Fuel Tank Capacity
7.5 l
Fuel Tank Capacity
7 l
Alternative Comparisons
VS.
Piaggio Liberty 50 2T 2015 vs
Piaggio Zip 50 2T 2018
VS.
Piaggio Zip 50 2T 2012 vs
Piaggio Zip 50 4T 2017
VS.
Piaggio ZIP 50 2022 vs
Piaggio Zip 50 2T 2018
VS.
Piaggio Zip 50 2T 2017 vs
Beeline Veloce 50 2014
VS.
Piaggio Zip 50 2T 2010 vs
Rieju MRT Pro Supermoto 50 2020
VS.
Piaggio Zip 50 2T 2009 vs
Piaggio Zip 50 4T E4 2020
VS.
Explorer Defender Evo 50 2009 vs
Piaggio Zip 50 2T 2018
VS.
Piaggio Zip 50 2T 2016 vs
Piaggio Zip 50 4T 2017
VS.
Piaggio Zip 50 2T 2009 vs
Piaggio Zip 50 4T 2018
VS.
KSR Moto Cracker 50 2018 vs
Piaggio Zip 50 2T 2010
VS.
Piaggio ZIP S 50 2022 vs
Piaggio Zip 50 2T 2016
VS.
Piaggio Zip 50 2T 2017 vs
Piaggio NRG Power 50 DD 2T 2017
VS.
Piaggio Typhoon Sport 50 2T 2012 vs
Piaggio Zip 50 2T 2010
1000PS Partner