Chigeecalimoto GmbHContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AG

BMW F 650 GS 2010 vs. Benelli TRK 702 X 2023

BMW F 650 GS 2010

BMW F 650 GS 2010

Benelli TRK 702 X 2023

Benelli TRK 702 X 2023

Loading...

Overview - BMW F 650 GS 2010 vs Benelli TRK 702 X 2023

BMW F 650 GS 2010

BMW F 650 GS 2010

Benelli TRK 702 X 2023

Benelli TRK 702 X 2023

Technical Specifications BMW F 650 GS 2010 compared to Benelli TRK 702 X 2023

BMW F 650 GS 2010
Benelli TRK 702 X 2023
BMW F 650 GS 2010
BMW F 650 GS 2010
Benelli TRK 702 X 2023
Benelli TRK 702 X 2023

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore82 mmBore83 mm
StrokeStroke75.6 mmStroke64.5 mm
Engine powerEngine power71 HPEngine power76.2 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power7,000 rpmRpm at Max. Power8,750 rpm
TorqueTorque75 NmTorque68.2 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque4,500 rpmRpm at Torque6,250 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12 Compression Ratio11.6
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders2Cylinders2
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
LubricationLubricationDry sumpLubricationForced
DisplacementDisplacement798 ccmDisplacement698 ccm

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionSwing arm

Chassis

FrameFrameSteelFrameSteel

Brakes Front

PistonPistonDouble pistonPistonDouble piston

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonSingle piston

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width100 mmFront tyre width110 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height80 %Front tyre height80 %
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width140 mmRear tyre width150 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height80 %Rear tyre height70 %
LengthLength2,280 mmLength2,225 mm
WidthWidth890 mmWidth915 mm
HeightHeight1,240 mmHeight1,475 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,575 mmWheelbase1,492 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height790 mmSeat Height836 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity16 lFuel Tank Capacity20 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA2

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

BMW F 650 GS 2010

BMW F 650 GS 2010

When it comes to optional extras, accessories and driver equipment, BMW is the benchmark for us. The driver can have his vehicle configured exactly to his wishes and also order the matching clothing at the same time.

Manoeuvrability

agility

low seat height can be reduced again

heated grips

comfortable seat

resale value.

Wind protection somewhat suboptimal compared to the F800.

Benelli TRK 702 X 2023

Benelli TRK 702 X 2023

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price BMW F 650 GS vs Benelli TRK 702 X

Price BMW F 650 GS

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Benelli TRK 702 X

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

BMW F 650 GS 2010
VS.
BMW F 800 GS 2010

BMW F 650 GS 2010 vs
BMW F 800 GS 2010

BMW F 650 CS 2005
VS.
BMW F 650 GS 2005

BMW F 650 CS 2005 vs
BMW F 650 GS 2005

Benelli TRK 702 X 2023
VS.
KTM 890 Adventure 2021

Benelli TRK 702 X 2023 vs
KTM 890 Adventure 2021

BMW F 650 GS 2006
VS.
BMW F 650 GS Dakar 2006

BMW F 650 GS 2006 vs
BMW F 650 GS Dakar 2006

BMW F 650 GS 2012
VS.
BMW F 700 GS 2013

BMW F 650 GS 2012 vs
BMW F 700 GS 2013

BMW F 650 GS 2012
VS.
BMW G 650 GS 2016

BMW F 650 GS 2012 vs
BMW G 650 GS 2016

BMW F 650 GS 2009
VS.
Honda XL 700V Transalp 2009

BMW F 650 GS 2009 vs
Honda XL 700V Transalp 2009

BMW F 650 GS 2009
VS.
BMW G 650 GS 2011

BMW F 650 GS 2009 vs
BMW G 650 GS 2011

BMW F 650 GS 2012
VS.
BMW F 800 GS 2011

BMW F 650 GS 2012 vs
BMW F 800 GS 2011

BMW F 650 GS 2009
VS.
Royal Enfield Himalayan 2021

BMW F 650 GS 2009 vs
Royal Enfield Himalayan 2021

BMW F 650 CS 2005
VS.
BMW F 650 GS 2010

BMW F 650 CS 2005 vs
BMW F 650 GS 2010

Suzuki V-Strom 650 XT 2023
VS.
Benelli TRK 702 X 2023

Suzuki V-Strom 650 XT 2023 vs
Benelli TRK 702 X 2023

BMW F 650 GS 2012
VS.
Yamaha Tenere 700 2020

BMW F 650 GS 2012 vs
Yamaha Tenere 700 2020

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH