Husqvarna SM 125 S 2006 vs. Husqvarna SM 610 2009

Husqvarna SM 125 S 2006

Husqvarna SM 125 S 2006

Husqvarna SM 610 2009

Husqvarna SM 610 2009

Loading...

Overview - Husqvarna SM 125 S 2006 vs Husqvarna SM 610 2009

Husqvarna SM 125 S 2006

Husqvarna SM 125 S 2006

Husqvarna SM 610 2009

Husqvarna SM 610 2009

Technical Specifications Husqvarna SM 125 S 2006 compared to Husqvarna SM 610 2009

Husqvarna SM 125 S 2006
Husqvarna SM 610 2009

Engine and Drive Train

CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement125 ccmDisplacement576 ccm

Dimensions and Weights

WheelbaseWheelbase1,470 mmWheelbase1,485 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height870 mmSeat Height910 mm
Dry WeightDry Weight113.5 kgDry Weight142.5 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity10.2 lFuel Tank Capacity12.5 l

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Husqvarna SM 125 S 2006

Husqvarna SM 125 S 2006

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Husqvarna SM 610 2009

Husqvarna SM 610 2009

The Husky is by no means an inexpensive entry-level bike. However, single-cylinder enthusiasts looking for power, a great chassis and civil service intervals have come to the right place with the Husky. A good iron!

Optimal chassis

independent geometry

linear steering feel

high-quality fork

qualitative workmanship.

Hakelige ignition lock seems to have been reworked cheaply

high price

not suitable for long-distance travel

spare parts supply problematic.

Alternative Comparisons