Husaberg FE 570 2009 vs. KTM 690 Duke 2013

Husaberg FE 570 2009

Husaberg FE 570 2009

KTM 690 Duke 2013

KTM 690 Duke 2013

Loading...

Technical Specifications Husaberg FE 570 2009 compared to KTM 690 Duke 2013

Husaberg FE 570 2009
KTM 690 Duke 2013

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore100 mmBore102 mm
StrokeStroke72 mmStroke84.5 mm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio11.8 Compression Ratio12.6
StarterStarterElectricStarterElectric
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement565.5 ccmDisplacement690 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
BrandBrandWPBrandWP

Suspension Rear

BrandBrandWPBrandWP

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter21 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter18 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,475 mmWheelbase1,466 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height985 mmSeat Height835 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity8.5 lFuel Tank Capacity14 l

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Husaberg FE 570 2009

Husaberg FE 570 2009

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

KTM 690 Duke 2013

KTM 690 Duke 2013

For pure fun, the 690 Duke without the R is already sufficient. The potent single-cylinder engine is almost identical, as is the weight and handling, and the appearance is too similar to be a real selling point for the 690 Duke R.

Light weight

sufficient power

low consumption

No chassis adjustment possible

low comfort

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Husaberg FE 570 vs KTM 690 Duke

Price Husaberg FE 570

Unfortunately, the data available to us is not sufficient to provide meaningful price information for this model.

Price KTM 690 Duke

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH