Yamaha XJ6 2012 vs. Yamaha FZ-6N 2010

Yamaha XJ6 2012

Yamaha XJ6 2012

Yamaha FZ-6N 2010

Yamaha FZ-6N 2010

Loading...

Technical Specifications Yamaha XJ6 2012 compared to Yamaha FZ-6N 2010

Yamaha XJ6 2012
Yamaha FZ-6N 2010
Yamaha XJ6 2012
Yamaha XJ6 2012
Yamaha FZ-6N 2010
Yamaha FZ-6N 2010

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore65.5 mmBore65.5 mm
StrokeStroke44.5 mmStroke44.5 mm
Engine powerEngine power78 HPEngine power78 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power10,000 rpmRpm at Max. Power11,500 rpm
TorqueTorque59.7 NmTorque51.6 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque8,500 rpmRpm at Torque10,000 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12.2 Compression Ratio12.2
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
IgnitionIgnitionTransistorIgnitionDigital
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders4Cylinders4
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesDOHC
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement600 ccmDisplacement600 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionTelescopic forkFront suspensionTelescopic fork

Chassis

FrameFrameSteelFrameAluminium

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width160 mmRear tyre width180 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height60 %Rear tyre height50 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,120 mmLength2,095 mm
WidthWidth770 mmWidth755 mm
HeightHeight1,085 mmHeight1,085 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,440 mmWheelbase1,440 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height785 mmSeat Height795 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity17 lFuel Tank Capacity19.4 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Yamaha XJ6 2012

Yamaha XJ6 2012

Despite the common basis, the XJ appears much younger and more aggressive. A mid-cass motorbike that by no means makes you feel mid-range. Except for the swingarm, the motorbike appears quite high-quality and cool. The bike is a little easier to handle than the Diversion.

rider-friendly performance characteristics

optimal clutch

playful, lighter handling

seat comfort

individual look

young

aggressive

high-quality.

Design components not too demanding

torque development

Yamaha FZ-6N 2010

Yamaha FZ-6N 2010

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Price Comparison Average Market Price Yamaha XJ6 vs Yamaha FZ-6N

Price Yamaha XJ6

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Yamaha FZ-6N

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

Yamaha FZ6-N S2 2009
VS.
Yamaha XJ6 2010

Yamaha FZ6-N S2 2009 vs
Yamaha XJ6 2010

Yamaha XJ6 Diversion 2015
VS.
Yamaha XJ6 2016

Yamaha XJ6 Diversion 2015 vs
Yamaha XJ6 2016

Kawasaki ER-6n 2016
VS.
Yamaha XJ6 2016

Kawasaki ER-6n 2016 vs
Yamaha XJ6 2016

Yamaha XJ6 2015
VS.
Suzuki SV 650 2021

Yamaha XJ6 2015 vs
Suzuki SV 650 2021

Yamaha MT-07 2021
VS.
Yamaha XJ6 2013

Yamaha MT-07 2021 vs
Yamaha XJ6 2013

Yamaha MT-07 2021
VS.
Yamaha XJ6 2016

Yamaha MT-07 2021 vs
Yamaha XJ6 2016

Honda CB 500 F 2020
VS.
Yamaha XJ6 2010

Honda CB 500 F 2020 vs
Yamaha XJ6 2010

Yamaha XJ6 2016
VS.
Honda CB650F 2015

Yamaha XJ6 2016 vs
Honda CB650F 2015

Yamaha FZ6-N S2 2009
VS.
Yamaha FZ-6N 2010

Yamaha FZ6-N S2 2009 vs
Yamaha FZ-6N 2010

Yamaha XJ6 2012
VS.
Suzuki GSR 600 2008

Yamaha XJ6 2012 vs
Suzuki GSR 600 2008

Yamaha XJ6 2015
VS.
Yamaha MT-07 2020

Yamaha XJ6 2015 vs
Yamaha MT-07 2020

Yamaha XJ6 2012
VS.
Kawasaki ER-6n 2012

Yamaha XJ6 2012 vs
Kawasaki ER-6n 2012

Yamaha XJ6 2012
VS.
Yamaha FZ6-N S2 2009

Yamaha XJ6 2012 vs
Yamaha FZ6-N S2 2009