KTM 625 SMC 2005 vs. Husqvarna TE 630 2012

KTM 625 SMC 2005

Husqvarna TE 630 2012

Overview - KTM 625 SMC 2005 vs Husqvarna TE 630 2012

KTM 625 SMC 2005

Husqvarna TE 630 2012

Technical Specifications KTM 625 SMC 2005 compared to Husqvarna TE 630 2012

KTM 625 SMC 2005

Husqvarna TE 630 2012

KTM 625 SMC 2005

Husqvarna TE 630 2012

Engine and Drive Train

Transmission	Transmission	Chain	Transmission	Chain
Cylinders	Cylinders	1	Cylinders	1
Strokes	Strokes	4-Stroke	Strokes	4-Stroke
Cooling	Cooling	liquid	Cooling	liquid
Displacement	Displacement	625 ccm	Displacement	600 ccm

Dimensions and Weights

Wheelbase	Wheelbase	1,510 mm	Wheelbase	1,485 mm
Seat Height	Seat Height	910 mm	Seat Height	945 mm
Dry Weight	Dry Weight	146 kg	Dry Weight	150 kg
Fuel Tank Capacity	Fuel Tank Capacity	9.2 l	Fuel Tank Capacity	12 l

Pros and Cons in comparison

KTM 625 SMC 2005

For power freaks, the KTM 625SMC is an excellent compromise in road use. The iron marches splendidly, has an e-start, reasonable service intervals and also offers some comfort. In terms of handling and agility, it can't quite keep up with the two lightweights 450 Husky and 650 Berg.

Steel rear

approved for 2 persons

suitable for everyday use

e-starter

high-quality details

comfort.

The already old headlight mask is a bit boring

Nothing for beginners

A bit heavier than racing supermotos

Husqvarna TE 630 2012

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

KTM 625 SMC 2005 vs. Husqvarna TE 630 2012

Overview - KTM 625 SMC 2005 vs Husqvarna TE 630 2012

Technical Specifications KTM 625 SMC 2005 compared to Husqvarna TE 630 2012

Engine and Drive Train

Dimensions and Weights

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

KTM 625 SMC 2005

Husqvarna TE 630 2012

1000PS Partner