Husqvarna TE 310 2012 vs. Suzuki RM-Z250 2009

Husqvarna TE 310 2012

Husqvarna TE 310 2012

Suzuki RM-Z250 2009

Suzuki RM-Z250 2009

Loading...

Overview - Husqvarna TE 310 2012 vs Suzuki RM-Z250 2009

Husqvarna TE 310 2012

Husqvarna TE 310 2012

Suzuki RM-Z250 2009

Suzuki RM-Z250 2009

Technical Specifications Husqvarna TE 310 2012 compared to Suzuki RM-Z250 2009

Husqvarna TE 310 2012
Suzuki RM-Z250 2009

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore83 mmBore77 mm
StrokeStroke55 mmStroke53.6 mm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12.9 Compression Ratio13.4
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement297 ccmDisplacement249 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
BrandBrandMarzocchiBrandShowa

Suspension Rear

BrandBrandMarzocchiBrandShowa

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width90 mmFront tyre width80 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height90 %Front tyre height100 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter21 inchFront tyre diameter21 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width120 mmRear tyre width110 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height90 %Rear tyre height90 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter18 inchRear tyre diameter19 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,495 mmWheelbase1,465 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height963 mmSeat Height955 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity7.2 lFuel Tank Capacity7 l

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Husqvarna TE 310 vs Suzuki RM-Z250

Price Husqvarna TE 310

Unfortunately, the data available to us is not sufficient to provide meaningful price information for this model.

Price Suzuki RM-Z250

Model year
Current average market prices