BMW R 1200 GS 2012 vs. Triumph Tiger Sport 2016

BMW R 1200 GS 2012

BMW R 1200 GS 2012

Triumph Tiger Sport 2016

Triumph Tiger Sport 2016

Loading...

Technical Specifications BMW R 1200 GS 2012 compared to Triumph Tiger Sport 2016

BMW R 1200 GS 2012
Triumph Tiger Sport 2016

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeBoxerEngine typeIn line
BoreBore101 mmBore79 mm
StrokeStroke73 mmStroke71.4 mm
Engine powerEngine power110 HPEngine power125 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power7,750 rpmRpm at Max. Power9,400 rpm
TorqueTorque120 NmTorque104 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque6,000 rpmRpm at Torque4,300 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12 Compression Ratio12
Clutch TypeClutch TypeToughened, DryClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionProp shaftTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders2Cylinders3
CoolingCoolingOil-airCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement1,170 ccmDisplacement1,050 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionStrutFront suspensionTelescopic fork
AdjustmentAdjustmentPreloadAdjustmentCompression, Rebound

Suspension Rear

AdjustmentAdjustmentPreloadAdjustmentCompression, Rebound

Chassis

Frame typeFrame typeLoad-bearing engineFrame typeTwin Tube

Brakes Front

PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonDouble pistonPistonDouble piston
Shock mountShock mountFloating caliperShock mountFloating caliper

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width110 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height80 %Front tyre height70 %
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width110 mmRear tyre width180 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height80 %Rear tyre height55 %
LengthLength2,210 mmLength2,150 mm
WidthWidth915 mmWidth835 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,507 mmWheelbase1,540 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height850 mmSeat Height830 mm
Kerb WeightKerb Weight229 kgKerb Weight235 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity20 lFuel Tank Capacity20 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

BMW R 1200 GS 2012

BMW R 1200 GS 2012

Either it was a stroke of luck or the best developers were at work - handlebars, geometry, seat, knee angle, footrests - it just fits really well for the majority of Central Europeans. All in all, there is still no motorbike that can kill the GS.

Optimal wind protection

comfortable seat

good posture

positive ergonomics

weather robust

quiet chassis.

Seat a little too low.

Triumph Tiger Sport 2016

Triumph Tiger Sport 2016

The Tiger Sport is a riding machine that can do much more than promised in the brochure. It was sportier than I thought it would be, but at the same time it offered more riding comfort.

Very universal

very agile handling but still easy and safe to drive

high ride comfort

great price / performance ratio

great tuned engine.

The Tiger Sport succeeds in almost all areas. Only in the suspension setup is the compromise, which is what this vehicle is, noticeable in some situations.

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price BMW R 1200 GS vs Triumph Tiger Sport

Price BMW R 1200 GS

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Triumph Tiger Sport

Model year
Current average market prices