BMW S 1000 R 2016 vs. BMW HP4 2013

BMW S 1000 R 2016

BMW S 1000 R 2016

BMW HP4 2013

BMW HP4 2013

Loading...

Overview - BMW S 1000 R 2016 vs BMW HP4 2013

BMW S 1000 R 2016

BMW S 1000 R 2016

BMW HP4 2013

BMW HP4 2013

Technical Specifications BMW S 1000 R 2016 compared to BMW HP4 2013

BMW S 1000 R 2016
BMW HP4 2013

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore80 mmBore80 mm
StrokeStroke49.7 mmStroke49.7 mm
Engine powerEngine power160 HPEngine power193 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power11,000 rpmRpm at Max. Power13,000 rpm
TorqueTorque112 NmTorque112 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque9,250 rpmRpm at Torque9,750 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12 Compression Ratio13
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath, AntihoppingClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath, Antihopping
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders4Cylinders4
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement999 ccmDisplacement999 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionTelescopic fork

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionSwing arm

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameAluminium
Frame typeFrame typeTwin TubeFrame typeTwin Tube

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons
TechnologyTechnologyradialTechnologyradial, Monoblock

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonSingle piston
Shock mountShock mountFloating caliperShock mountFloating caliper

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsDynamic suspensionAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsDynamic suspension, Quickshifter, Traction control

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width190 mmRear tyre width200 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,057 mmLength2,056 mm
WidthWidth845 mmWidth826 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,439 mmWheelbase1,423 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height814 mmSeat Height820 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity17.5 lFuel Tank Capacity17.5 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

BMW S 1000 R 2016

BMW S 1000 R 2016

With the BMW S 1000 R, you notice both the close relationship to the S 1000 RR superbike and the endeavour to equip the machine with a high degree of comfort for country roads and everyday use. Accordingly, the 1000cc four-cylinder power unit is brute and yet easily controllable, and the seating position is correspondingly sporty and comfortable. The fact that the S 1000 R is one of the most affordable power naked bikes is surprising and very pleasing, although one must not get hold of the list of optional extras - because thanks to the many irresistible features, it will certainly be more expensive.

Powerful and well controllable engine

powerful braking system

comfortable seating position

irresistible but expensive optional extras

hard chassis

BMW HP4 2013

BMW HP4 2013

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price BMW S 1000 R vs BMW HP4

Price BMW S 1000 R

Model year
Current average market prices

Price BMW HP4

Model year
Current average market prices

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH