Royal Enfield Interceptor 650 2019 vs. BMW R nineT 2014

Royal Enfield Interceptor 650 2019

Royal Enfield Interceptor 650 2019

BMW R nineT 2014

BMW R nineT 2014

Loading...

Overview - Royal Enfield Interceptor 650 2019 vs BMW R nineT 2014

Royal Enfield Interceptor 650 2019

Royal Enfield Interceptor 650 2019

BMW R nineT 2014

BMW R nineT 2014

Technical Specifications Royal Enfield Interceptor 650 2019 compared to BMW R nineT 2014

Royal Enfield Interceptor 650 2019
BMW R nineT 2014

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn line crankpin offsetEngine typeBoxer
BoreBore78 mmBore101 mm
StrokeStroke67.8 mmStroke73 mm
Engine powerEngine power47 HPEngine power110 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power7,100 rpmRpm at Max. Power7,750 rpm
TorqueTorque52 NmTorque119 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque4,000 rpmRpm at Torque6,000 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio9.5 Compression Ratio12
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeToughened, Dry
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionProp shaft
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders2Cylinders2
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
CoolingCoolingOil-airCoolingOil-air
DisplacementDisplacement648 ccmDisplacement1,170 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionTelescopic forkFront suspensionTelescopic fork

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionParalever

Chassis

Frame typeFrame typeLoad-bearing engineFrame typeLoad-bearing engine

Brakes Front

TypeTypeSingle diskTypeDouble disk
PistonPistonDouble pistonPistonFour pistons

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width100 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height90 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter18 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width130 mmRear tyre width180 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height70 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter18 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,122 mmLength2,220 mm
WidthWidth789 mmWidth890 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,400 mmWheelbase1,476 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height804 mmSeat Height785 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity13.7 lFuel Tank Capacity17 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyA2License compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Royal Enfield Interceptor 650 2019

Royal Enfield Interceptor 650 2019

While the Continental GT 650 is not a completely new model visually (there is already the Conti GT 535), an Interceptor 650 with a two-cylinder engine is now coming onto the market for the first time in almost 50 years. The styling therefore skilfully reflects the flair of the 1960s, while the technology is up to date. You won't find any electronic features, but the parallel twin-cylinder engine with 48 hp and 53 Newton metres of torque is surprisingly agile and the handling is very neutral. The Brembo brake is also pleasing with good dosing and the Pirelli tyres do not show any weaknesses. The seating position is very comfortable, so if you don't want to ride your Interceptor 650 so sportily, you can cruise comfortably - it can do that very well too.

Agile and refined powerplant

cool two-cylinder sound

comfortable seating position

stable handling

good brakes

successful old school look

classic round instruments

reasonable price.

ABS not quite sensitive

no electronic features - in case anyone needs them...

BMW R nineT 2014

BMW R nineT 2014

Very worthy retro machine. The other classic manufacturers really need to catch up.

Optics, engine, fork, workmanship

A touch too little rebound damping in the shock absorber

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Royal Enfield Interceptor 650 vs BMW R nineT

Price Royal Enfield Interceptor 650

Model year
Current average market prices

Price BMW R nineT

Model year
Current average market prices