BMW S 1000 RR 2010 vs. KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2019

BMW S 1000 RR 2010

BMW S 1000 RR 2010

KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2019

KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2019

Loading...

Overview - BMW S 1000 RR 2010 vs KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2019

BMW S 1000 RR 2010

BMW S 1000 RR 2010

KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2019

KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2019

Technical Specifications BMW S 1000 RR 2010 compared to KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2019

BMW S 1000 RR 2010
KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2019

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore80 mmBore108 mm
StrokeStroke49.7 mmStroke71 mm
Engine powerEngine power192 HPEngine power177 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power13,000 rpmRpm at Max. Power8,870 rpm
TorqueTorque112 NmTorque144 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque9,750 rpmRpm at Torque6,500 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio13 Compression Ratio13.2
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath, AntihoppingClutch TypeAntihopping
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders4Cylinders2
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement999 ccmDisplacement1,301 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionTelescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameChromium-molybdenum
Frame typeFrame typeTwin TubeFrame typeTubular

Brakes Front

PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons
Shock mountShock mountFixed caliperShock mountFixed caliper
TechnologyTechnologyradialTechnologyradial, Monoblock

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonDouble piston
Shock mountShock mountFloating caliperShock mountFixed caliper

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width190 mmRear tyre width190 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
WheelbaseWheelbase1,432 mmWheelbase1,482 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height820 mmSeat Height835 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity17.5 lFuel Tank Capacity18 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

BMW S 1000 RR 2010

BMW S 1000 RR 2010

We have a strict and merciless order from the boss to thank for that. There are tough performance checks before the S 1000 RR leaves the factory. At BMW, they didn't want to show their hand and risk even one disappointing test bench report finding its way into the media.

Superior performance

well-functioning driving aids

very fast

optimal price.

Agility

complicated handling

braking stability

high weight.

KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2019

KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2019

The epithet "Beast" is not completely out of the blue, the KTM is and remains a brutal naked bike - 177 hp from two pots with a combined displacement of 1301 cubic metres is nothing harmless. Nevertheless, it is surprisingly easy to control; the upright seating position combined with the good handling make it seem almost docile. Compared to its predecessor, it has been improved precisely at its weakest points. The engine now runs more smoothly, the shift assistant brings calmness in the acceleration phase and the chassis has been improved in quality. But it still loves the wild chase more than high speed in long curves.

Provides a wonderful adrenaline rush

extensive configuration options

terrific brakes with cornering ABS

practical electronic features

great seating position

electronic features can be set very sporty and also deactivated

very good shift assistant

Precise stroke not always easy to hit

one of the most dangerous motorbikes for the driving licence on the market

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price BMW S 1000 RR vs KTM 1290 Super Duke R

Price BMW S 1000 RR

Model year
Current average market prices

Price KTM 1290 Super Duke R

Model year
Current average market prices

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH