Husqvarna SM 610 2009 vs. Husqvarna SM 450 RR 2009

Husqvarna SM 610 2009

Husqvarna SM 450 RR 2009

Overview - Husqvarna SM 610 2009 vs Husqvarna SM 450 RR 2009

Husqvarna SM 610 2009

Husqvarna SM 450 RR 2009

Technical Specifications Husqvarna SM 610 2009 compared to Husqvarna SM 450 RR 2009

Husqvarna SM 610 2009

Husqvarna SM 450 RR 2009

Husqvarna SM 610 2009

Husqvarna SM 450 RR 2009

Engine and Drive Train

Bore	Bore	98 mm	Bore	97 mm
Stroke	Stroke	76.4 mm	Stroke	60.76 mm
Starter	Starter	Electric	Starter	Electric
Cooling	Cooling	liquid	Cooling	liquid
Displacement	Displacement	576 ccm	Displacement	449 ccm

Suspension Front

Brand	Brand	Sachs	Brand	Sachs

Suspension Rear

Brand	Brand	Sachs	Brand	Sachs

Brakes Front

Brand	Brand	Brembo	Brand	Brembo

Brakes Rear

Type	Type	Disc	Type	Disc
Brand	Brand	Brembo	Brand	Brembo

Dimensions and Weights

Rear tyre diameter	Rear tyre diameter	17 inch	Rear tyre diameter	17 inch
Wheelbase	Wheelbase	1,485 mm	Wheelbase	1,446 mm
Seat Height	Seat Height	910 mm	Seat Height	940 mm
Dry Weight	Dry Weight	142.5 kg	Dry Weight	112 kg
Fuel Tank Capacity	Fuel Tank Capacity	12.5 l	Fuel Tank Capacity	7.2 l

Pros and Cons in comparison

Husqvarna SM 610 2009

The Husky is by no means an inexpensive entry-level bike. However, single-cylinder enthusiasts looking for power, a great chassis and civil service intervals have come to the right place with the Husky. A good iron!

Optimal chassis

independent geometry

linear steering feel

high-quality fork

qualitative workmanship.

Hakelige ignition lock seems to have been reworked cheaply

high price

not suitable for long-distance travel

spare parts supply problematic.

Husqvarna SM 450 RR 2009

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.